» Articles » PMID: 38391104

Inter-device Agreement of Sacral Subepidermal Oedema Measurement in Healthy Adults During Prolonged 60° Head of Bed Elevation

Overview
Journal Nurs Open
Specialty Nursing
Date 2024 Feb 23
PMID 38391104
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To investigate the level of agreement between the SEM 200 and Provisio® subepidermal moisture sacral delta measurements, which may indicate increased pressure injury risk, in healthy adults during 120 min of prolonged 60° head of bed elevation. This position, which requires the elevation of the patient's upper body at a 60° angle above the horizontal plane for an extended period, is used by clinicians to prevent or manage a patient's medical or surgical conditions.

Design: This prospective exploratory study recruited 20 healthy adults during October 2021 and collected sacral subepidermal moisture delta measurements using the SEM 200 and Provisio® devices.

Methods: Delta measurements were taken at 20-min intervals over 120 min resulting in seven data collection timepoints. Descriptive statistics and a Bland Altman plot analysis were conducted.

Results: A total of 280 sacral subepidermal moisture delta measurements were gathered or 140 per device. There were good levels of agreement between the two devices at baseline (T0) [mean 0.025; SD 0.137] and following 60- (T3) [mean 0.025; SD 0.111], 80- (T4) [mean -0.01; SD 0.177] and 100 min (T5) [mean 0.01; SD 0.129] of prolonged 60° head of bed elevation. Head of bed elevations can increase a patient's risk of sacral pressure injuries. In some countries, nurses have access to the SEM 200 and/or the Provisio® device, so our findings may increase nurses' confidence in the interchangeability of the device measurements, although further research is needed to confirm this. The SEM 200 and Provisio® subepidermal moisture scanners show promise in gathering similar objective pressure injury risk data which could prompt clinicians to implement prevention strategies.

Impact: Current pressure injury risk assessment is largely subjective in nature. This quantitative study on healthy human sacral tissue found a good level of agreement in the SEM 200 and Provisio® subepidermal moisture scanners, which may increase nurses' confidence in the interchangeability of the devices in clinical practice.

Citing Articles

A systematic review on the impact of sub-epidermal moisture assessments on pressure ulcer/injury care delivery pathways.

Avsar P, Patton D, Cuddigan J, Moore Z Int Wound J. 2024; 21(6):e14928.

PMID: 38832363 PMC: 11148479. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14928.


Inter-device agreement of sacral subepidermal oedema measurement in healthy adults during prolonged 60° head of bed elevation.

Latimer S, Bone M, Walker R, Thalib L, Gillespie B Nurs Open. 2024; 11(2):e2103.

PMID: 38391104 PMC: 10830921. DOI: 10.1002/nop2.2103.

References
1.
Gefen A, Ross G . The subepidermal moisture scanner: the technology explained. J Wound Care. 2020; 29(Sup2c):S10-S16. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2020.29.Sup2c.S10. View

2.
Peko L, Gefen A . Sensitivity and laboratory performances of a second-generation sub-epidermal moisture measurement device. Int Wound J. 2020; 17(3):864-867. PMC: 7949264. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13339. View

3.
Li Z, Lin F, Thalib L, Chaboyer W . Global prevalence and incidence of pressure injuries in hospitalised adult patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020; 105:103546. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103546. View

4.
Bland J, Altman D . Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999; 8(2):135-60. DOI: 10.1177/096228029900800204. View

5.
Lustig M, Wiggermann N, Gefen A . How patient migration in bed affects the sacral soft tissue loading and thereby the risk for a hospital-acquired pressure injury. Int Wound J. 2020; 17(3):631-640. PMC: 7217162. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13316. View