» Articles » PMID: 38371314

The Effectiveness and Safety of Octocog Alfa in Patients with Hemophilia A: Up to 7-year Follow-up of the Real-world AHEAD International Study

Overview
Specialty Hematology
Date 2024 Feb 19
PMID 38371314
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Real-world data assessing treatment outcomes in patients with hemophilia A in routine clinical practice are limited.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of octocog alfa in patients with moderate/severe hemophilia A receiving treatment in clinical practice.

Design: The international Antihemophilic Factor Hemophilia A Outcome Database study is an observational, noninterventional, prospective, multicenter study.

Methods: This planned interim data read-out was conducted following 7 years of observation of patients receiving octocog alfa (cut-off, 30 June 2020). The primary endpoint was joint health status, assessed by the Gilbert Score. Secondary endpoints included annualized bleeding rates (ABRs), Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS), health-related quality of life, consumption, and safety. This analysis stratified data by hemophilia severity at baseline [moderate, factor VIII (FVIII) 1-5%; severe, FVIII <1%].

Results: Of the 711 patients in this analysis, 582 (82%) were receiving prophylaxis with octocog alfa at enrollment, and 498 (70%) had severe disease. Median Gilbert Scores were higher with on-demand therapy prophylaxis and scores were comparable in moderate and severe disease. In patients receiving prophylaxis, there was an improvement in HJHS Global Gait Score over 7 years of follow-up overall and in patients with severe disease. ABRs and annualized joint bleeding rates were low across all 7 years. An ABR of zero was reported in 34-56% of prophylaxis patients 20-40% in the on-demand group. ABRs were similar in severe and moderate disease. In total, 13/702 (1.9%) patients experienced 18 treatment-related adverse events.

Conclusion: These data demonstrate the long-term effectiveness and safety of octocog alfa in patients with moderate and severe hemophilia A, especially in those receiving prophylaxis. The high number of patients receiving on-demand treatment experiencing zero bleeds could be due to selection bias within the study, with patients with less severe disease more likely to be receiving on-demand treatment.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02078427.

Citing Articles

The imperative to prevent joint bleeding in everyone living with hemophilia.

Valentino L Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024; 8(2):102383.

PMID: 38590364 PMC: 11000100. DOI: 10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102383.

References
1.
Valentino L, Mamonov V, Hellmann A, Quon D, Chybicka A, Schroth P . A randomized comparison of two prophylaxis regimens and a paired comparison of on-demand and prophylaxis treatments in hemophilia A management. J Thromb Haemost. 2012; 10(3):359-67. PMC: 3488301. DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04611.x. View

2.
Ware Jr J, Kosinski M, Keller S . A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996; 34(3):220-33. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003. View

3.
Srivastava A, Santagostino E, Dougall A, Kitchen S, Sutherland M, Pipe S . WFH Guidelines for the Management of Hemophilia, 3rd edition. Haemophilia. 2020; 26 Suppl 6:1-158. DOI: 10.1111/hae.14046. View

4.
Manco-Johnson M, Abshire T, Shapiro A, Riske B, Hacker M, Kilcoyne R . Prophylaxis versus episodic treatment to prevent joint disease in boys with severe hemophilia. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(6):535-44. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa067659. View

5.
Oldenburg J . Optimal treatment strategies for hemophilia: achievements and limitations of current prophylactic regimens. Blood. 2015; 125(13):2038-44. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-01-528414. View