» Articles » PMID: 22212248

A Randomized Comparison of Two Prophylaxis Regimens and a Paired Comparison of On-demand and Prophylaxis Treatments in Hemophilia A Management

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Hematology
Date 2012 Jan 4
PMID 22212248
Citations 64
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Prophylaxis with factor (F)VIII is considered the optimal treatment for managing hemophilia A patients without inhibitors.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of two prophylaxis regimens (primary outcome) and of on-demand and prophylaxis treatments (secondary outcome), and to continue the evaluation of immunogenicity and overall safety of the ADVATE Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant), Plasma/Albumin Free Method (rAHF-PFM).

Patients/methods: Previously on-demand-treated patients aged 7-59 years (n = 66) with FVIII levels ≤ 2% received 6 months of on-demand treatment and then were randomized to 12 months of either standard (20-40 IU kg(-1) every other day) or pharmacokinetic (PK)-tailored (20-80 IU kg(-1) every third day) prophylaxis, both regimens intended to maintain FVIII trough levels at or above 1%. Efficacy was evaluated in terms of annualized bleeding rates (ABRs). As subjects were first treated on-demand and then on prophylaxis, statistical comparisons between these treatments were paired.

Results: Twenty-two (33.3%) subjects on prophylaxis experienced no bleeding episodes, whereas none treated on-demand were free from an episode of bleeding. ABRs for the two prophylaxis regimens were comparable, whereas differences between on-demand and either prophylaxis were statistically significant (P < 0.0001): median (interquartile range [IQR]) ABRs were 43.9 (21.9), 1.0 (3.5), 2.0 (6.9) and 1.1 (4.9) during on-demand treatment, standard, PK-tailored and any prophylaxis, respectively. There were no differences in FVIII consumption or adverse event rates between prophylaxis regimens. No subject developed FVIII inhibitors.

Conclusions: The present study demonstrates comparable safety and effectiveness for two prophylaxis regimens and that prophylaxis significantly reduces bleeding compared with on-demand treatment. PK-tailored prophylaxis offers an alternative to standard prophylaxis for the prevention of bleeding.

Citing Articles

Efanesoctocog Alfa versus Standard and Extended Half-Life Factor VIII Prophylaxis in Adolescent and Adult Patients with Haemophilia A without Inhibitors.

Klamroth R, Kragh N, Arnaud A, Guyot P, Wilson A, Wojciechowski P Adv Ther. 2024; 42(1):427-441.

PMID: 39576433 PMC: 11782424. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-03032-3.


Effectiveness of emicizumab in preventing bleeding events in severe and moderate hemophilia A: A single-center experience in Bangladesh.

Tory S, Ghosh S, Nazneen H, Farhad N, Islam S, Hasan M EJHaem. 2024; 5(1):39-46.

PMID: 38406515 PMC: 10887364. DOI: 10.1002/jha2.832.


The effectiveness and safety of octocog alfa in patients with hemophilia A: up to 7-year follow-up of the real-world AHEAD international study.

Ozelo M, Hermans C, Carcao M, Guillet B, Gu J, Guerra R Ther Adv Hematol. 2024; 15:20406207231218624.

PMID: 38371314 PMC: 10874143. DOI: 10.1177/20406207231218624.


Bleeding pattern and consumption of factor VIII concentrate in adult patients with haemophilia A without inhibitors in the Czech Republic between 2013 and 2021 (Czech National Haemophilia Programme registry data).

Romanova G, Smejkal P, Ovesna P, Drbohlavova E, Dulicek P, Hajsmanova Z Ann Hematol. 2023; 102(11):3261-3270.

PMID: 37740066 PMC: 10567882. DOI: 10.1007/s00277-023-05453-6.


Barriers to prophylactic treatment among patients with haemophilia A in Shandong Province, China: a qualitative study.

Liu Z, Feng J, Fang Y, Cheng Y, Li S Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023; 18(1):226.

PMID: 37537616 PMC: 10398971. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-023-02838-8.


References
1.
Shapiro A, Gruppo R, Pabinger I, Collins P, Hay C, Schroth P . Integrated analysis of safety and efficacy of a plasma- and albumin-free recombinant factor VIII (rAHF-PFM) from six clinical studies in patients with hemophilia A. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2009; 9(3):273-83. DOI: 10.1517/14712590902729392. View

2.
Manco-Johnson M, Abshire T, Shapiro A, Riske B, Hacker M, Kilcoyne R . Prophylaxis versus episodic treatment to prevent joint disease in boys with severe hemophilia. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(6):535-44. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa067659. View

3.
Nilsson I, Berntorp E, Lofqvist T, Pettersson H . Twenty-five years' experience of prophylactic treatment in severe haemophilia A and B. J Intern Med. 1992; 232(1):25-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1992.tb00546.x. View

4.
Collins P, Blanchette V, Fischer K, Bjorkman S, Oh M, Fritsch S . Break-through bleeding in relation to predicted factor VIII levels in patients receiving prophylactic treatment for severe hemophilia A. J Thromb Haemost. 2009; 7(3):413-20. DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.03270.x. View

5.
Morado M, Villar A, Jimenez Yuste V, Quintana M, Hernandez Navarro F . Prophylactic treatment effects on inhibitor risk: experience in one centre. Haemophilia. 2005; 11(2):79-83. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2005.00921.x. View