A Randomized Comparison of Two Prophylaxis Regimens and a Paired Comparison of On-demand and Prophylaxis Treatments in Hemophilia A Management
Overview
Affiliations
Background: Prophylaxis with factor (F)VIII is considered the optimal treatment for managing hemophilia A patients without inhibitors.
Objectives: To compare the efficacy of two prophylaxis regimens (primary outcome) and of on-demand and prophylaxis treatments (secondary outcome), and to continue the evaluation of immunogenicity and overall safety of the ADVATE Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant), Plasma/Albumin Free Method (rAHF-PFM).
Patients/methods: Previously on-demand-treated patients aged 7-59 years (n = 66) with FVIII levels ≤ 2% received 6 months of on-demand treatment and then were randomized to 12 months of either standard (20-40 IU kg(-1) every other day) or pharmacokinetic (PK)-tailored (20-80 IU kg(-1) every third day) prophylaxis, both regimens intended to maintain FVIII trough levels at or above 1%. Efficacy was evaluated in terms of annualized bleeding rates (ABRs). As subjects were first treated on-demand and then on prophylaxis, statistical comparisons between these treatments were paired.
Results: Twenty-two (33.3%) subjects on prophylaxis experienced no bleeding episodes, whereas none treated on-demand were free from an episode of bleeding. ABRs for the two prophylaxis regimens were comparable, whereas differences between on-demand and either prophylaxis were statistically significant (P < 0.0001): median (interquartile range [IQR]) ABRs were 43.9 (21.9), 1.0 (3.5), 2.0 (6.9) and 1.1 (4.9) during on-demand treatment, standard, PK-tailored and any prophylaxis, respectively. There were no differences in FVIII consumption or adverse event rates between prophylaxis regimens. No subject developed FVIII inhibitors.
Conclusions: The present study demonstrates comparable safety and effectiveness for two prophylaxis regimens and that prophylaxis significantly reduces bleeding compared with on-demand treatment. PK-tailored prophylaxis offers an alternative to standard prophylaxis for the prevention of bleeding.
Klamroth R, Kragh N, Arnaud A, Guyot P, Wilson A, Wojciechowski P Adv Ther. 2024; 42(1):427-441.
PMID: 39576433 PMC: 11782424. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-03032-3.
Tory S, Ghosh S, Nazneen H, Farhad N, Islam S, Hasan M EJHaem. 2024; 5(1):39-46.
PMID: 38406515 PMC: 10887364. DOI: 10.1002/jha2.832.
Ozelo M, Hermans C, Carcao M, Guillet B, Gu J, Guerra R Ther Adv Hematol. 2024; 15:20406207231218624.
PMID: 38371314 PMC: 10874143. DOI: 10.1177/20406207231218624.
Romanova G, Smejkal P, Ovesna P, Drbohlavova E, Dulicek P, Hajsmanova Z Ann Hematol. 2023; 102(11):3261-3270.
PMID: 37740066 PMC: 10567882. DOI: 10.1007/s00277-023-05453-6.
Liu Z, Feng J, Fang Y, Cheng Y, Li S Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023; 18(1):226.
PMID: 37537616 PMC: 10398971. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-023-02838-8.