» Articles » PMID: 18690340

Surgical Evaluation of a Recombinant Factor VIII Prepared Using a Plasma/albumin-free Method: Efficacy and Safety of Advate in Previously Treated Patients

Overview
Journal Thromb Haemost
Publisher Thieme
Date 2008 Aug 12
PMID 18690340
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Evaluation of factor F(V)III replacement in patients with haemophilia A undergoing surgery is critical for FVIII concentrates, yet large scale, multi-center prospective studies, particularly using continuous infusion, are generally lacking for new products. This study evaluated efficacy and safety of a newly developed recombinant FVIII (rAHF-PFM) administered by bolus or continuous infusion in haemophilia A patients undergoing surgery. Subjects > or =5 years of age with baseline FVIII:C < or =2%, and > or =150 prior FVIII exposure days were included in this prospective, international, open-label, uncontrolled clinical trial. rAHF-PFM was administered perioperatively by bolus infusion (BI) or continuous infusion (CI) according to the standard use at the center to prevent bleeding complication. Both the surgeon and haematologist rated efficacy during hospitalization. Fifty-eight subjects underwent 65 surgical procedures (22 major haemorrhagic risk; 35 minor, 8 dental procedures). Bolus infusion was used exclusively in 47 procedures and continuous infusion, with or without supplemental bolus infusions, in 18. Haemostatic efficacy was assessed as excellent or good for 100% of intraoperative ratings (17 CI, 44 BI, 61 total procedures), and 100% of postoperative ratings performed at time of discharge (18 CI, 44 BI, 62 total procedures). Median total consumption of rAHF-PFM during hospitalization was 822 IU/kg/surgery with CI and 910 IU/kg/surgery with BI. Overall rAHF-PFM was well tolerated, and FVIII inhibitors were not detected. In conclusion, rAHF-PFM administered via continuous infusion or bolus injections is safe, non-immunogenic, and effective for perioperative hemostatic management in previously treated haemophilia A patients.

Citing Articles

The effectiveness and safety of octocog alfa in patients with hemophilia A: up to 7-year follow-up of the real-world AHEAD international study.

Ozelo M, Hermans C, Carcao M, Guillet B, Gu J, Guerra R Ther Adv Hematol. 2024; 15:20406207231218624.

PMID: 38371314 PMC: 10874143. DOI: 10.1177/20406207231218624.


Managing surgery in hemophilia with recombinant factor VIII Fc and factor IX Fc: Data on safety and effectiveness from phase 3 pivotal studies.

Chowdary P, Holmstrom M, Mahlangu J, Ozelo M, Pabinger I, Pasi K Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022; 6(5):e12760.

PMID: 35910942 PMC: 9326287. DOI: 10.1002/rth2.12760.


Quality of clinical studies present in the package inserts of coagulation factors used in the treatment of hemophilia.

Araujo Y, Paolinelli J, Pichitelli J, Rios D, Baldoni N, Baldoni A Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2022; 20:eAO6859.

PMID: 35544898 PMC: 9071259. DOI: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2022AO6859.


Clinical Analysis of Hospitalized Patients with Hemophilia A: Single-hemophilia Treatment Center Experience in Korea over 10 years.

Kim J, Park S, You C Blood Res. 2021; 56(3):141-149.

PMID: 34349040 PMC: 8478617. DOI: 10.5045/br.2021.2020289.


Results of a randomized phase III/IV trial comparing intermittent bolus versus continuous infusion of antihaemophilic factor (recombinant) in adults with severe or moderately severe haemophilia A undergoing major orthopaedic surgery.

Pabinger I, Mamonov V, Windyga J, Engl W, Doralt J, Tangada S Haemophilia. 2021; 27(3):e331-e339.

PMID: 33772963 PMC: 8252548. DOI: 10.1111/hae.14219.