» Articles » PMID: 38370393

Molecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Myeloperoxidase Activity Identifies Culprit Lesions and Predicts Future Atherothrombosis

Abstract

Aims: Unstable atherosclerotic plaques have increased activity of myeloperoxidase (MPO). We examined whether molecular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of intraplaque MPO activity predicts future atherothrombosis in rabbits and correlates with ruptured human atheroma.

Methods And Results: Plaque MPO activity was assessed in rabbits ( = 12) using the MPO-gadolinium (Gd) probe at 8 and 12 weeks after induction of atherosclerosis and before pharmacological triggering of atherothrombosis. Excised plaques were used to confirm MPO activity by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MSMS) and to determine MPO distribution by histology. MPO activity was higher in plaques that caused post-trigger atherothrombosis than plaques that did not. Among the MRI metrics, the plaques' R1 relaxation rate after administration of MPO-Gd was the best predictor of atherothrombosis. MPO activity measured in human carotid endarterectomy specimens ( = 30) by MPO-Gd-enhanced MRI was correlated with patient MRI and histological plaque phenotyping, as well as LC-MSMS. MPO-Gd retention measured as the change in R1 relaxation from baseline was significantly greater in histologic and MRI-graded American Heart Association (AHA) type VI than type III-V plaques. This association was confirmed by comparing AHA grade to MPO activity determined by LC-MSMS.

Conclusion: We show that elevated intraplaque MPO activity detected by molecular MRI employing MPO-Gd predicts future atherothrombosis in a rabbit model and detects ruptured human atheroma, strengthening the translational potential of this approach to prospectively detect high-risk atherosclerosis.

References
1.
Daghem M, Bing R, Fayad Z, Dweck M . Noninvasive Imaging to Assess Atherosclerotic Plaque Composition and Disease Activity: Coronary and Carotid Applications. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 13(4):1055-1068. PMC: 10661368. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.03.033. View

2.
Ambrose J, Tannenbaum M, Alexopoulos D, Leavy J, Weiss M, Borrico S . Angiographic progression of coronary artery disease and the development of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988; 12(1):56-62. DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)90356-7. View

3.
Dweck M, Maurovich-Horvat P, Leiner T, Cosyns B, Fayad Z, Gijsen F . Contemporary rationale for non-invasive imaging of adverse coronary plaque features to identify the vulnerable patient: a Position Paper from the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Atherosclerosis and Vascular Biology and the European.... Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020; 21(11):1177-1183. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa201. View

4.
Fisher M, Paganini-Hill A, Martin A, Cosgrove M, Toole J, Barnett H . Carotid plaque pathology: thrombosis, ulceration, and stroke pathogenesis. Stroke. 2005; 36(2):253-7. DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000152336.71224.21. View

5.
Zini C, Venneri M, Miglietta S, Caruso D, Porta N, Isidori A . USPIO-labeling in M1 and M2-polarized macrophages: An in vitro study using a clinical magnetic resonance scanner. J Cell Physiol. 2017; 233(8):5823-5828. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.26360. View