Fast-Response Variable-Stiffness Magnetic Catheters for Minimally Invasive Surgery

Overview

Journal Adv Sci (Weinh)

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2024 Jan 16

PMID 38225742

Authors

Yegor Piskarev

Yi Sun

Matteo Righi

Quentin Boehler

Christophe Chautems

Cedric Fischer

Bradley J Nelson

Jun Shintake

Dario Floreano

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

In minimally invasive surgery, such as cardiac ablation, magnetically steered catheters made of variable-stiffness materials can enable higher dexterity and higher force application to human tissue. However, the long transition time between soft and rigid states leads to a significant increase in procedure duration. Here, a fast-response, multisegmented catheter is described for minimally invasive surgery made of variable-stiffness thread (FRVST) that encapsulates a helical cooling channel. The rapid stiffness change in the FRVST, composed of a nontoxic shape memory polymer, is achieved by an active cooling system that pumps water through the helical channel. The FRVST displays a 66 times stiffness change and a 26 times transition enhancement compare with the noncooled version. The catheter allows for selective bending of each segment up to 127° in air and up to 76° in water under an 80 mT external magnetic field. The inner working channel can be used for cooling an ablation tip during a procedure and for information exchange via the deployment of wires or surgical tools.

Citing Articles

A compliant metastructure design with reconfigurability up to six degrees of freedom.

Yang H, Patel D, Johnson T, Zhong K, Olson G, Majidi C Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):719.

PMID: 39820271 PMC: 11739503. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-55591-2.

Multi-Section Magnetic Soft Robot with Multirobot Navigation System for Vasculature Intervention.

Li Z, Xu Q Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2024; 5:0188.

PMID: 39610760 PMC: 11602701. DOI: 10.34133/cbsystems.0188.

Thermally Drawn Polymeric Catheters for MR-Guided Cardiovascular Intervention.

Abdelaziz M, Tian L, Lottner T, Reiss S, Heidt T, Maier A Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 11(45):e2407704.

PMID: 39403885 PMC: 11615795. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202407704.

Design, Modeling, and Experimental Validation of an Active Microcatheter Driven by Shape Memory Effects.

Li C, Zhang X, Ren Z, Wang J, Sun S, Fu J Micromachines (Basel). 2024; 15(5).

PMID: 38793176 PMC: 11123389. DOI: 10.3390/mi15050603.

Silicone-based highly stretchable multifunctional fiber pumps.

Kanno R, Shimizu K, Murakami K, Shibahara Y, Ogawa N, Akai H Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):4618.

PMID: 38409217 PMC: 10897224. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55472-0.

References

Chun J, Ernst S, Matthews S, Schmidt B, Bansch D, Boczor S . Remote-controlled catheter ablation of accessory pathways: results from the magnetic laboratory. Eur Heart J. 2007; 28(2):190-5. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl447. View

Neradi D, Kumar V, Kumar S, Sodavarapu P, Goni V, Dhatt S . Minimally Invasive Surgery versus Open Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Asian Spine J. 2021; 16(2):279-289. PMC: 9066260. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2020.0605. View

Houmsse M, Daoud E . Biophysics and clinical utility of irrigated-tip radiofrequency catheter ablation. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2011; 9(1):59-70. DOI: 10.1586/erd.11.42. View

Tangwongsan C, Will J, Webster J, Meredith Jr K, Mahvi D . In vivo measurement of swine endocardial convective heat transfer coefficient. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004; 51(8):1478-86. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2004.828035. View

Le H, Phan P, Lin C, Jiajun L, Phee S . A Temperature-Dependent, Variable-Stiffness Endoscopic Robotic Manipulator with Active Heating and Cooling. Ann Biomed Eng. 2020; 48(6):1837-1849. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-020-02495-z. View

Mattmann M, De Marco C, Briatico F, Tagliabue S, Colusso A, Chen X . Thermoset Shape Memory Polymer Variable Stiffness 4D Robotic Catheters. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2021; 9(1):e2103277. PMC: 8728812. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202103277. View

Tonazzini A, Mintchev S, Schubert B, Mazzolai B, Shintake J, Floreano D . Variable Stiffness Fiber with Self-Healing Capability. Adv Mater. 2016; 28(46):10142-10148. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201602580. View

Tangwongsan C, Chachati L, Webster J, Farrell P . In vitro calibration of a system for measurement of in vivo convective heat transfer coefficient in animals. Biomed Eng Online. 2006; 5:57. PMC: 1635717. DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-5-57. View

Piskarev Y, Sun Y, Righi M, Boehler Q, Chautems C, Fischer C . Fast-Response Variable-Stiffness Magnetic Catheters for Minimally Invasive Surgery. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 11(12):e2305537. PMC: 10966541. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202305537. View

10.

Kawamura M, Scheinman M, Tseng Z, Lee B, Marcus G, Badhwar N . Comparison of remote magnetic navigation ablation and manual ablation of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia after failed manual ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2016; 48(1):35-42. DOI: 10.1007/s10840-016-0158-x. View

11.

Gang E, Nguyen B, Shachar Y, Farkas L, Farkas L, Marx B . Dynamically shaped magnetic fields: initial animal validation of a new remote electrophysiology catheter guidance and control system. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011; 4(5):770-7. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.110.959692. View

12.

Oxley T, Opie N, John S, Rind G, Ronayne S, Wheeler T . Minimally invasive endovascular stent-electrode array for high-fidelity, chronic recordings of cortical neural activity. Nat Biotechnol. 2016; 34(3):320-7. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3428. View

13.

Han M, Chen L, Aras K, Liang C, Chen X, Zhao H . Catheter-integrated soft multilayer electronic arrays for multiplexed sensing and actuation during cardiac surgery. Nat Biomed Eng. 2020; 4(10):997-1009. PMC: 8021456. DOI: 10.1038/s41551-020-00604-w. View

14.

Piorkowski C, Eitel C, Rolf S, Bode K, Sommer P, Gaspar T . Steerable versus nonsteerable sheath technology in atrial fibrillation ablation: a prospective, randomized study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011; 4(2):157-65. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.110.957761. View

15.

Wang Y, Jeng U, Hsu S . Biodegradable Water-Based Polyurethane Shape Memory Elastomers for Bone Tissue Engineering. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2021; 4(4):1397-1406. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00091. View

16.

Brancadoro M, Manti M, Grani F, Tognarelli S, Menciassi A, Cianchetti M . Toward a Variable Stiffness Surgical Manipulator Based on Fiber Jamming Transition. Front Robot AI. 2021; 6:12. PMC: 7806054. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00012. View

17.

Capron L, Bruneval P . Influence of applied stress on mitotic response of arteries to injury with a balloon catheter: quantitative study in rat thoracic aorta. Cardiovasc Res. 1989; 23(11):941-8. DOI: 10.1093/cvr/23.11.941. View

18.

Grubb N, Furniss S . Science, medicine, and the future: Radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation. BMJ. 2001; 322(7289):777-80. PMC: 1119956. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.322.7289.777. View

19.

Kanagaratnam P, Koa-Wing M, Wallace D, Goldenberg A, Peters N, Davies D . Experience of robotic catheter ablation in humans using a novel remotely steerable catheter sheath. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2008; 21(1):19-26. PMC: 2262917. DOI: 10.1007/s10840-007-9184-z. View

20.

Kece F, Zeppenfeld K, Trines S . The Impact of Advances in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Devices on the Incidence and Prevention of Complications. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2018; 7(3):169-180. PMC: 6141930. DOI: 10.15420/aer.2018.7.3. View