» Articles » PMID: 18202905

Experience of Robotic Catheter Ablation in Humans Using a Novel Remotely Steerable Catheter Sheath

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2008 Jan 19
PMID 18202905
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A novel remotely controlled steerable guide catheter has been developed to enable precise manipulation and stable positioning of any eight French (Fr) or smaller electrophysiological catheter within the heart for the purposes of mapping and ablation.

Objective: To report our initial experience using this system for remotely performing catheter ablation in humans.

Methods: Consecutive patients attending for routine ablation were recruited. Various conventional diagnostic catheters were inserted through the left femoral vein in preparation for treating an accessory pathway (n = 1), atrial flutter (n = 2) and atrial fibrillation (n = 7). The steerable guide catheter was inserted into the right femoral vein through which various irrigated and non-irrigated tip ablation catheters were used. Conventional endpoints of loss of pathway conduction, bidirectional cavotricuspid isthmus block and four pulmonary vein isolation were used to determine acute procedural success.

Results: Ten patients underwent remote catheter ablation using conventional and/or 3D non-fluoroscopic mapping technologies. All procedural endpoints were achieved using the robotic control system without manual manipulation of the ablation catheter. There was no major complication. A radiation dosimeter positioned next to the operator 2.7 m away from the X-ray source showed negligible exposure despite a mean cumulative dose area product of 7,281.4 cGycm(2) for all ten ablation procedures.

Conclusions: Safe and clinically effective remote navigation of ablation catheters can be achieved using a novel remotely controlled steerable guide catheter in a variety of arrhythmias. The system is compatible with current mapping and ablation technologies Remote navigation substantially reduces radiation exposure to the operator.

Citing Articles

Fast-Response Variable-Stiffness Magnetic Catheters for Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Piskarev Y, Sun Y, Righi M, Boehler Q, Chautems C, Fischer C Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 11(12):e2305537.

PMID: 38225742 PMC: 10966541. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202305537.


Technical and Clinical Progress on Robot-Assisted Endovascular Interventions: A Review.

Duan W, Akinyemi T, Du W, Ma J, Chen X, Wang F Micromachines (Basel). 2023; 14(1).

PMID: 36677258 PMC: 9864595. DOI: 10.3390/mi14010197.


Robot-assisted techniques in vascular and endovascular surgery.

Puschel A, Schafmayer C, Gross J Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022; 407(5):1789-1795.

PMID: 35226179 PMC: 8884093. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02465-0.


An Isomorphic Interactive Device for the Interventional Surgical Robot after In Vivo Study.

Yang C, Guo S, Bao X Micromachines (Basel). 2022; 13(1).

PMID: 35056276 PMC: 8778927. DOI: 10.3390/mi13010111.


Contact Stability and Contact Safety of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Robotic Catheter Under Heart Surface Motion.

Hao R, Tuna E, Cavusoglu M J Dyn Syst Meas Control. 2021; 143(7):071010.

PMID: 33994580 PMC: 8086176. DOI: 10.1115/1.4049837.


References
1.
Thal S, Marrouche N . Novel applications in catheter ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2005; 13 Suppl 1:17-21. DOI: 10.1007/s10840-005-1781-0. View

2.
Chun J, Ernst S, Matthews S, Schmidt B, Bansch D, Boczor S . Remote-controlled catheter ablation of accessory pathways: results from the magnetic laboratory. Eur Heart J. 2007; 28(2):190-5. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl447. View

3.
Efstathopoulos E, Katritsis D, Kottou S, Kalivas N, Tzanalaridou E, Giazitzoglou E . Patient and staff radiation dosimetry during cardiac electrophysiology studies and catheter ablation procedures: a comprehensive analysis. Europace. 2006; 8(6):443-8. DOI: 10.1093/europace/eul041. View

4.
Saliba W, Cummings J, Oh S, Zhang Y, Mazgalev T, Schweikert R . Novel robotic catheter remote control system: feasibility and safety of transseptal puncture and endocardial catheter navigation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006; 17(10):1102-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00556.x. View

5.
Al-Ahmad A, Grossman J, Wang P . Early experience with a computerized robotically controlled catheter system. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2005; 12(3):199-202. DOI: 10.1007/s10840-005-0325-y. View