» Articles » PMID: 38203791

Comparative In Vitro Dissolution Assessment of Calcined and Uncalcined Hydroxyapatite Using Differences in Bioresorbability and Biomineralization

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2024 Jan 11
PMID 38203791
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study reports the effect of the not-calcining process on the bioresorption and biomineralization of hydroxyapatite through in vitro dissolution assessment. The prepared calcined hydroxyapatite (c-HAp) and uncalcined hydroxyapatite (unc-HAp) have a particle size of 2 μm and 13 μm, surface areas of 4.47 m/g and 108.08 m/g, and a Ca/P ratio of 1.66 and 1.52, respectively. In vitro dissolution assessments of c-HAp and unc-HAp were performed for 20 days at 37 °C in a citric acid buffer according to ISO 10993-14. During the dissolution, the c-HAp and unc-HAp confirmed an increase in weight, and the calcium and phosphorous ions were rapidly released. The calcium ions released from c-HAp formed rod-shaped particles with a longer and thinner morphology, while in unc-HAp, they appeared thicker and shorter. In the ICP-OES results, the concentrations of calcium elements were initially increased and then decreased by this formation. The rod-shaped particles identified as calcium citrate (Ca-citrate) through the XRD pattern. The calcium content of Ca-citrate particles from unc-HAp was higher than that from c-HAp. The unc-HAp demonstrated non-toxic properties in a cytotoxicity evaluation. Therefore, due to its higher bioresorption and biomineralization, unc-HAp exhibits enhanced biocompatibility compared to c-HAp.

Citing Articles

Bioresorption and Biomineralization of S53P4 Bioactive Glass in Neutral Tris Buffer and Citric Acid Solution.

Yoo K, Jang W, Chang J ACS Omega. 2024; 9(43):43678-43688.

PMID: 39493975 PMC: 11525500. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.4c06020.

References
1.
SHIKINAMI Y, Okuno M . Bioresorbable devices made of forged composites of hydroxyapatite (HA) particles and poly-L-lactide (PLLA): Part I. Basic characteristics. Biomaterials. 1999; 20(9):859-77. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(98)00241-5. View

2.
Ishizuka S, Dong Q, Ngo H, Bai Y, Sha J, Toda E . Bioactive Regeneration Potential of the Newly Developed Uncalcined/Unsintered Hydroxyapatite and Poly-l-Lactide-Co-Glycolide Biomaterial in Maxillofacial Reconstructive Surgery: An In Vivo Preliminary Study. Materials (Basel). 2021; 14(9). PMC: 8126161. DOI: 10.3390/ma14092461. View

3.
Noorani T, Luddin N, Ab Rahman I, Masudi S . In Vitro Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Novel Nano-Hydroxyapatite-Silica Incorporated Glass Ionomer Cement. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017; 11(4):ZC105-ZC109. PMC: 5449899. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24753.9739. View

4.
Li J, Deng C, Liang W, Kang F, Bai Y, Ma B . Mn-containing bioceramics inhibit osteoclastogenesis and promote osteoporotic bone regeneration via scavenging ROS. Bioact Mater. 2021; 6(11):3839-3850. PMC: 8050801. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.03.039. View

5.
Zhang Y, Shu T, Wang S, Liu Z, Cheng Y, Li A . The Osteoinductivity of Calcium Phosphate-Based Biomaterials: A Tight Interaction With Bone Healing. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10:911180. PMC: 9149242. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.911180. View