» Articles » PMID: 34068558

Bioactive Regeneration Potential of the Newly Developed Uncalcined/Unsintered Hydroxyapatite and Poly-l-Lactide-Co-Glycolide Biomaterial in Maxillofacial Reconstructive Surgery: An In Vivo Preliminary Study

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Jun 2
PMID 34068558
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Uncalcined/unsintered hydroxyapatite (HA) and poly-l-lactide-co-glycolide (u-HA/PLLA/PGA) are novel bioresorbable bioactive materials with bone regeneration characteristics and have been used to treat mandibular defects in a rat model. However, the bone regenerative interaction with the periosteum, the inflammatory response, and the degradation of this material have not been examined. In this study, we used a rat mandible model to compare the above features in u-HA/PLLA/PGA and uncalcined/unsintered HA and poly-l-lactic acid (u-HA/PLLA). We divided 11 male Sprague-Dawley rats into 3- and 16-week groups. In each group, we assessed the characteristics of a u-HA/PLLA/PGA sheet covering the right mandibular angle and a u-HA/PLLA sheet covering the left mandibular angle in three rats each, and one rat was used as a sham control. The remaining three rats in the 16-week group were used for a degradation assessment and received both sheets of material as in the material assessment subgroup. At 3 and 16 weeks after surgery, the rats were sacrificed, and mandible specimens were subjected to micro-computed tomography, histological analysis, and immunohistochemical staining. The results indicated that the interaction between the periosteum and u-HA/PLLA/PGA material produced significantly more new bone regeneration with a lower inflammatory response and a faster resorption rate compared to u-HA/PLLA alone. These findings may indicate that this new biomaterial has ideal potential in treating maxillofacial defects of the midface and orbital regions.

Citing Articles

Comparative In Vitro Dissolution Assessment of Calcined and Uncalcined Hydroxyapatite Using Differences in Bioresorbability and Biomineralization.

Jang W, Pyun J, Chang J Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(1).

PMID: 38203791 PMC: 10779548. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25010621.


Evaluation of Hard and Soft Tissue Responses to Four Different Generation Bioresorbable Materials-Poly-l-Lactic Acid (PLLA), Poly-l-Lactic Acid/Polyglycolic Acid (PLLA/PGA), Uncalcined/Unsintered Hydroxyapatite/Poly-l-Lactic Acid (u-HA/PLLA) and....

Ayasaka K, Ramanathan M, Huy N, Shijirbold A, Okui T, Tatsumi H Materials (Basel). 2023; 16(23).

PMID: 38068124 PMC: 10707338. DOI: 10.3390/ma16237379.


A Narrative Review of u-HA/PLLA, a Bioactive Resorbable Reconstruction Material: Applications in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Ngo H, Bai Y, Sha J, Ishizuka S, Toda E, Osako R Materials (Basel). 2022; 15(1).

PMID: 35009297 PMC: 8746248. DOI: 10.3390/ma15010150.

References
1.
SHIKINAMI Y, Okuno M . Bioresorbable devices made of forged composites of hydroxyapatite (HA) particles and poly-L-lactide (PLLA): Part I. Basic characteristics. Biomaterials. 1999; 20(9):859-77. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(98)00241-5. View

2.
Celikkin N, Mastrogiacomo S, Jaroszewicz J, Walboomers X, Swieszkowski W . Gelatin methacrylate scaffold for bone tissue engineering: The influence of polymer concentration. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2017; 106(1):201-209. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.36226. View

3.
Landes C, Ballon A, Tran A, Ghanaati S, Sader R . Segmental stability in orthognathic surgery: hydroxyapatite/Poly-l-lactide osteoconductive composite versus titanium miniplate osteosyntheses. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014; 42(6):930-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.01.013. View

4.
Ngo H, Dong Q, Bai Y, Sha J, Ishizuka S, Okui T . Bone Regeneration Capacity of Newly Developed Uncalcined/Unsintered Hydroxyapatite and Poly-l-lactide-co-glycolide Sheet in Maxillofacial Surgery: An In Vivo Study. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020; 11(1). PMC: 7824502. DOI: 10.3390/nano11010022. View

5.
Oonishi H, Hench L, Wilson J, Sugihara F, Tsuji E, Kushitani S . Comparative bone growth behavior in granules of bioceramic materials of various sizes. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999; 44(1):31-43. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199901)44:1<31::aid-jbm4>3.0.co;2-9. View