» Articles » PMID: 38130003

Physiologically-based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Prominent Oral Contraceptive Agents and Applications in Drug-drug Interactions

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2023 Dec 22
PMID 38130003
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Considerable interest remains across the pharmaceutical industry and regulatory landscape in capabilities to model oral contraceptives (OCs), whether combined (COCs) with ethinyl estradiol (EE) or progestin-only pill. Acceptance of COC drug-drug interaction (DDI) assessment using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) is often limited to the estrogen component (EE), requiring further verification, with extrapolation from EE to progestins discouraged. There is a paucity of published progestin component PBPK models to support the regulatory DDI guidance for industry to evaluate a new chemical entity's (NCE's) DDI potential with COCs. Guidance recommends a clinical interaction study to be considered if an investigational drug is a weak or moderate inducer, or a moderate/strong inhibitor, of CYP3A4. Therefore, availability of validated OC PBPK models within one software platform, will be useful in predicting the DDI potential with NCEs earlier in the clinical development. Thus, this work was focused on developing and validating PBPK models for progestins, DNG, DRSP, LNG, and NET, within Simcyp, and assessing the DDI potential with known CYP3A4 inhibitors (e.g., ketoconazole) and inducers (e.g., rifampicin) with published clinical data. In addition, this work demonstrated confidence in the Simcyp EE model for regulatory and clinical applications by extensive verification in 70+ clinical PK and CYP3A4 interaction studies. The results provide greater capability to prospectively model clinical CYP3A4 DDI with COCs using Simcyp PBPK to interrogate the regulatory decision-tree to contextualize the potential interaction by known perpetrators and NCEs, enabling model-informed decision making, clinical study designs, and delivering potential alternative COC options for women of childbearing potential.

Citing Articles

Advances in Modeling Approaches for Oral Drug Delivery: Artificial Intelligence, Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetics, and First-Principles Models.

Arav Y Pharmaceutics. 2024; 16(8).

PMID: 39204323 PMC: 11359797. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16080978.


Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling of prominent oral contraceptive agents and applications in drug-drug interactions.

Lewis G, Ahire D, Taskar K CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2023; 13(4):563-575.

PMID: 38130003 PMC: 11015076. DOI: 10.1002/psp4.13101.

References
1.
Barditch-Crovo P, Trapnell C, Ette E, Zacur H, Coresh J, Rocco L . The effects of rifampin and rifabutin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a combination oral contraceptive. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999; 65(4):428-38. DOI: 10.1016/S0009-9236(99)70138-4. View

2.
Rodrigues A . Drug Interactions Involving 17α-Ethinylestradiol: Considerations Beyond Cytochrome P450 3A Induction and Inhibition. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021; 111(6):1212-1221. DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2383. View

3.
Stanczyk F, Mroszczak E, Ling T, Runkel R, Henzl M, Miyakawa I . Plasma levels and pharmacokinetics of norethindrone and ethinylestradiol administered in solution and as tablets to women. Contraception. 1983; 28(3):241-51. DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(83)90065-3. View

4.
FOTHERBY K . Bioavailability of orally administered sex steroids used in oral contraception and hormone replacement therapy. Contraception. 1996; 54(2):59-69. DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(96)00136-9. View

5.
Hoffman S, Nicholson W, Smith J, Funk M, Hudgens M, Poole C . Reasons for hormonal contraceptive use in a cohort of African-American women living in the Detroit area. Contraception. 2020; 102(5):346-348. PMC: 7606661. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.07.093. View