» Articles » PMID: 24082040

The Effect of Combined Oral Contraception on Testosterone Levels in Healthy Women: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Date 2013 Oct 2
PMID 24082040
Citations 84
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: BACKGROUND; Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) reduce levels of androgen, especially testosterone (T), by inhibiting ovarian and adrenal androgen synthesis and by increasing levels of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG). Although this suppressive effect has been investigated by numerous studies over many years, to our knowledge no systematic review concerning this issue had been performed. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of COCs on concentrations of total T, free T and SHBG in healthy women and to evaluate differences between the various types of COCs (e.g. estrogen dose, type of progestin) and the assays used to assess total T and free T.

Methods: A review of the literature was performed using database searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials) and all publications (from inception date until July 2012) investigating the effect of COCs on androgen levels in healthy women were considered eligible for selection. Three reviewers were involved in study selection, data extraction and critical appraisal. For the meta-analysis, data on total T, free T and SHBG were extracted and combined using random effects analysis. Additional subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate differences between the various types of COCs (e.g. estrogen dose, type of progestin) and the assays used to assess total T or free T.

Results: A total of 151 records were identified by systematic review and 42 studies with a total of 1495 healthy young women (age range: 18-40 years) were included in the meta-analysis. All included studies were experimental studies and 21 were non-comparative. Pooling of the results derived from all the included papers showed that total T levels significantly decreased during COC use [mean difference (MD) (95% confidence interval, CI) -0.49 nmol/l (-0.55, -0.42); P < 0.001]. Significantly lower levels of free T were also found [relative change (95% CI) 0.39 (0.35, 0.43); P < 0.001], with a mean decrease of 61%. On the contrary, SHBG concentrations significantly increased during all types of COC use [MD (95% CI) 99.08 nmol/l (86.43, 111.73); P < 0.001]. Subgroup analyses revealed that COCs containing 20-25 µg EE had similar effects on total and free T compared with COCs with 30-35 µg EE. In addition, suppressive effects on T levels were not different when comparing different types of progestins. However, subgroup analyses for the estrogen dose and the progestin type in relation to changes in SHBG levels did show significant differences: COCs containing second generation progestins and/or the lower estrogen doses (20-25 µg EE) were found to have less impact on SHBG concentrations.

Conclusions: The current literature review and meta-analysis demonstrates that COCs decrease circulating levels of total T and free T and increase SBHG concentrations. Due to the SHBG increase, free T levels decrease twice as much as total T. The estrogen dose and progestin type of the COC do not influence the decline of total and free T, but both affect SHBG. The clinical implications of suppressed androgen levels during COC use remain to be elucidated.

Citing Articles

Eccentric training effects on hamstring muscles in oral contraceptive users and naturally menstruating women.

Seynnes O, Nordez A, Lacourpaille L, Hesseberg E, Vesterhus I, Fjeldberg K Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025; .

PMID: 40088271 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-025-05753-x.


The impact of ovulation-suppressing contraceptives on behavioral and functional difficulties in borderline personality disorder.

Katrinli S, Rothbaum A, DeMoss R, Turner W, Hunter B, Powers A Neuropsychopharmacology. 2025; .

PMID: 39799250 DOI: 10.1038/s41386-024-02045-4.


Plasma and salivary hormone responses to a 30-min exercise stress test in young, healthy, physically active females.

Baker C, Piasecki J, Hunt J, Foulds G, Hough J Physiol Rep. 2024; 12(24):e70168.

PMID: 39722131 PMC: 11669569. DOI: 10.14814/phy2.70168.


Original salivary sex hormone data of naturally menstruating athletes and hormonal contraceptive users.

Lafitte A, Dupuit M, Chassard T, Barlier K, Badier N, Duclos M BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2024; 10(4):e002078.

PMID: 39564535 PMC: 11575394. DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002078.


The Effects of Aerobic Exercise Training on Testosterone Concentration in Individuals Who are Obese or Have Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Healy R, Patten R, Bauer C, Woessner M, Bourke M, Grossmann M Sports Med Open. 2024; 10(1):117.

PMID: 39467940 PMC: 11519272. DOI: 10.1186/s40798-024-00781-x.


References
1.
Murphy A, Cropp C, Smith B, Burkman R, Zacur H . Effect of low-dose oral contraceptive on gonadotropins, androgens, and sex hormone binding globulin in nonhirsute women. Fertil Steril. 1990; 53(1):35-9. View

2.
Martel C, Sourla A, Pelletier G, Labrie C, Fournier M, Picard S . Predominant androgenic component in the stimulatory effect of dehydroepiandrosterone on bone mineral density in the rat. J Endocrinol. 1998; 157(3):433-42. DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.1570433. View

3.
Aden U, Kuhl H . A randomized cross-over study on various hormonal parameters of two triphasic oral contraceptives. Contraception. 1998; 58(2):75-81. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00071-7. View

4.
Kuhl H, Gahn G, Romberg G, Marz W, TAUBERT H . A randomized cross-over comparison of two low-dose oral contraceptives upon hormonal and metabolic parameters: I. Effects upon sexual hormone levels. Contraception. 1985; 31(6):583-93. DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(85)90058-7. View

5.
Sanam M, Ziba O . Desogestrel+ethinylestradiol versus levonorgestrel+ethinylestradiol. Which one has better affect on acne, hirsutism, and weight change. Saudi Med J. 2011; 32(1):23-6. View