» Articles » PMID: 38124255

How to Construct a Frailty Index from an Existing Dataset in 10 Steps

Overview
Journal Age Ageing
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2023 Dec 21
PMID 38124255
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The frailty index is commonly used in research and clinical practice to quantify health. Using a health deficit accumulation model, a frailty index can be calculated retrospectively from data collected via survey, interview, performance test, laboratory report, clinical or administrative medical record, or any combination of these. Here, we offer a detailed 10-step approach to frailty index creation, with a worked example.

Methods: We identified 10 steps to guide the creation of a valid and reliable frailty index. We then used data from waves 5 to 12 of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) to illustrate the steps.

Results: The 10 steps are as follows: (1) select every variable that measures a health problem; (2) exclude variables with more than 5% missing values; (3) recode the responses to 0 (no deficit) through 1 (deficit); (4) exclude variables when coded deficits are too rare (< 1%) or too common (> 80%); (5) screen the variables for association with age; (6) screen the variables for correlation with each other; (7) count the variables retained; (8) calculate the frailty index scores; (9) test the characteristics of the frailty index; (10) use the frailty index in analyses. In our worked example, we created a 61-item frailty index following these 10 steps.

Conclusions: This 10-step procedure can be used as a template to create one continuous health variable. The resulting high-information variable is suitable for use as an exposure, predictor or control variable, or an outcome measure of overall health and ageing.

Citing Articles

Frailty and loneliness among community-dwelling older adults: examining reciprocal associations within a measurement burst design.

Schultz A, Mayerl H, Freidl W, Stolz E BMC Geriatr. 2025; 25(1):139.

PMID: 40025426 PMC: 11872317. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-025-05808-w.


Development of a psychological frailty index: results from the China health and retirement longitudinal study.

Zhao J, Liu J, Fernandez D, Tyrovolas S Front Psychol. 2025; 16:1495733.

PMID: 40008339 PMC: 11850362. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1495733.


Selecting Appropriate Clinical Trial Endpoints for Geroscience Trials: A Path Towards Consensus.

Kritchevsky S, Zamora E, Bhasin S, Cohen A, Chandler A, Covinsky K Res Sq. 2025; .

PMID: 39989956 PMC: 11844647. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5920485/v1.


Enhancing in-hospital mortality prediction in older patients with sepsis: the role of frailty indices and multidrug-resistance status in non-ICU wards-a proof-of-concept study.

Okoye C, Piazzoli A, Ferrara M, Finazzi A, Ornago A, Pinardi E Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025; 37(1):45.

PMID: 39985722 PMC: 11846750. DOI: 10.1007/s40520-025-02955-3.


Associations of estimated glucose disposal rate with frailty progression: results from two prospective cohorts.

Wang Z, Zhu J, Xuan S, Dong S, Shen Z, Chen S Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025; 24(1):81.

PMID: 39972476 PMC: 11841016. DOI: 10.1186/s12933-025-02650-7.


References
1.
Mitnitski A, Rockwood K . The rate of aging: the rate of deficit accumulation does not change over the adult life span. Biogerontology. 2015; 17(1):199-204. DOI: 10.1007/s10522-015-9583-y. View

2.
Farrell S, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K, Rutenberg A . Network model of human aging: Frailty limits and information measures. Phys Rev E. 2016; 94(5-1):052409. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.94.052409. View

3.
Abeliansky A, Erel D, Strulik H . Social vulnerability and aging of elderly people in the United States. SSM Popul Health. 2021; 16:100924. PMC: 8463908. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100924. View

4.
Stolz E, Hoogendijk E, Mayerl H, Freidl W . Frailty Changes Predict Mortality in 4 Longitudinal Studies of Aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020; 76(9):1619-1626. PMC: 8361367. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glaa266. View

5.
Gordon E, Hubbard R . Do sex differences in chronic disease underpin the sex-frailty paradox?. Mech Ageing Dev. 2019; 179:44-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.mad.2019.02.004. View