» Articles » PMID: 39254900

Prevalence and Future Estimates of Frailty and Pre-frailty in a Population-based Sample of People 70 Years and Older in Norway: the HUNT Study

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2024 Sep 10
PMID 39254900
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Frailty in older people is a rising global health concern; therefore, monitoring prevalence estimates and presenting projections of future frailty are important for healthcare planning.

Aim: To present current prevalence estimates of frailty and pre-frailty and future projections according to both dominant frailty models in a large population-based observational study including adults ≥ 70 years in Norway.

Methods: In this population-based observational study, we included 9956 participants from the HUNT4 70 + study, conducting assessments at field stations, homes, and nursing homes. Frailty was assessed using Fried criteria and a 35-item frailty index (HUNT4-FI). Inverse probability weighting and calibration using post-stratification weights and aggregated register data for Norway according to age, sex, and education ensured representativeness, and population projection models were used to estimate future prevalence.

Results: According to Fried criteria, the current prevalence rates of frailty and pre-frailty in people ≥ 70 years were 10.6% and 41.9%, respectively, and for HUNT4-FI 35.8% and 33.2%, respectively. Compared to previous European estimates we identified higher overall frailty prevalence, but lower prevalence in younger age groups. Projections suggest the number of Norwegian older adults living with frailty will close to double by 2040.

Conclusion: Frailty in older people in Norway is more prevalent than previous European estimates, emphasising the imperative for effective interventions aimed to delay and postpone frailty and ensure healthcare system sustainability in an ageing population. Future planning should consider the great heterogeneity in health and functioning within the 70 + population.

References
1.
Fried L, Cohen A, Xue Q, Walston J, Bandeen-Roche K, Varadhan R . The physical frailty syndrome as a transition from homeostatic symphony to cacophony. Nat Aging. 2021; 1(1):36-46. PMC: 8409463. DOI: 10.1038/s43587-020-00017-z. View

2.
Wennberg A, Yin W, Fang F, Pedersen N, Hagg S, Jylhava J . Comparison of two different frailty scales in the longitudinal Swedish Adoption/Twin Study of Aging (SATSA). Scand J Public Health. 2021; 51(4):587-594. PMC: 10265292. DOI: 10.1177/14034948211059958. View

3.
Blodgett J, Theou O, Kirkland S, Andreou P, Rockwood K . Frailty in NHANES: Comparing the frailty index and phenotype. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2015; 60(3):464-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2015.01.016. View

4.
Skirbekk V, Dieleman J, Stonawski M, Fejkiel K, Tyrovolas S, Chang A . The health-adjusted dependency ratio as a new global measure of the burden of ageing: a population-based study. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022; 3(5):e332-e338. DOI: 10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00075-7. View

5.
OCaoimh R, Sezgin D, ODonovan M, Molloy D, Clegg A, Rockwood K . Prevalence of frailty in 62 countries across the world: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-level studies. Age Ageing. 2020; 50(1):96-104. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afaa219. View