» Articles » PMID: 27967091

Network Model of Human Aging: Frailty Limits and Information Measures

Overview
Journal Phys Rev E
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2016 Dec 15
PMID 27967091
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aging is associated with the accumulation of damage throughout a persons life. Individual health can be assessed by the Frailty Index (FI). The FI is calculated simply as the proportion f of accumulated age-related deficits relative to the total, leading to a theoretical maximum of f≤1. Observational studies have generally reported a much more stringent bound, with f≤f_{max}<1. The value of f_{max} in observational studies appears to be nonuniversal, but f_{max}≈0.7 is often reported. A previously developed network model of individual aging was unable to recover f_{max}<1 while retaining the other observed phenomenology of increasing f and mortality rates with age. We have developed a computationally accelerated network model that also allows us to tune the scale-free network exponent α. The network exponent α significantly affects the growth of mortality rates with age. However, we are only able to recover f_{max} by also introducing a deficit sensitivity parameter 1-q, which is equivalent to a false-negative rate q. Our value of q=0.3 is comparable to finite sensitivities of age-related deficits with respect to mortality that are often reported in the literature. In light of nonzero q, we use mutual information I to provide a nonparametric measure of the predictive value of the FI with respect to individual mortality. We find that I is only modestly degraded by q<1, and this degradation is mitigated when increasing number of deficits are included in the FI. We also find that the information spectrum, i.e., the mutual information of individual deficits versus connectivity, has an approximately power-law dependence that depends on the network exponent α. Mutual information I is therefore a useful tool for characterizing the network topology of aging populations.

Citing Articles

Demographics of co-ageing complex systems: from infected worms to chess games.

Eskin C, Vural D R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(11):240932.

PMID: 39539505 PMC: 11557240. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.240932.


Frailty trajectories preceding dementia: an individual-level analysis of four cohort studies in the United States and United Kingdom.

Ward D, Flint J, Littlejohns T, Foote I, Canevelli M, Wallace L Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 38746437 PMC: 11092835. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4314795/v1.


Dynamical Network Stability Analysis of Multiple Biological Ages Provides a Framework for Understanding the Aging Process.

Pridham G, Rutenberg A J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2024; 79(10).

PMID: 38206765 PMC: 11639168. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glae021.


How to construct a frailty index from an existing dataset in 10 steps.

Theou O, Haviva C, Wallace L, Searle S, Rockwood K Age Ageing. 2023; 52(12).

PMID: 38124255 PMC: 10733590. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afad221.


Modelling lifespan reduction in an exogenous damage model of generic disease.

Tobin R, Pridham G, Rutenberg A Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):16304.

PMID: 37770483 PMC: 10539353. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-43005-0.