» Articles » PMID: 38124013

Category-Selective Representation of Relationships in the Visual Cortex

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2023 Dec 20
PMID 38124013
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Understanding social interaction requires processing social agents and their relationships. The latest results show that much of this process is visually solved: visual areas can represent multiple people encoding emergent information about their interaction that is not explained by the response to the individuals alone. A neural signature of this process is an increased response in visual areas, to face-to-face (seemingly interacting) people, relative to people presented as unrelated (back-to-back). This effect highlighted a network of visual areas for representing relational information. Using functional MRI, we measured the brain activity of healthy female and male humans (= 42), in response to images of two faces or two (head-blurred) bodies, facing toward or away from each other. Taking the effect as a signature of relation perception, we found that relations between faces and between bodies were coded in distinct areas, mirroring the categorical representation of faces and bodies in the visual cortex. Additional analyses suggest the existence of a third network encoding relations between (nonsocial) objects. Finally, a separate occipitotemporal network showed the generalization of relational information across body, face, and nonsocial object dyads (multivariate pattern classification analysis), revealing shared properties of relations across categories. In sum, beyond single entities, the visual cortex encodes the relations that bind multiple entities into relationships; it does so in a category-selective fashion, thus respecting a general organizing principle of representation in high-level vision. Visual areas encoding visual relational information can reveal the processing of emergent properties of social (and nonsocial) interaction, which trigger inferential processes.

Citing Articles

Neural Encoding of Bodies for Primate Social Perception.

Abassi E, Bognar A, de Gelder B, Giese M, Isik L, Lappe A J Neurosci. 2024; 44(40).

PMID: 39358024 PMC: 11450534. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1221-24.2024.


Innate sensitivity to face-to-face biological motion.

Zanon M, Lemaire B, Papeo L, Vallortigara G iScience. 2024; 27(2):108793.

PMID: 38299110 PMC: 10828802. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.108793.

References
1.
Baeck A, Wagemans J, Op de Beeck H . The distributed representation of random and meaningful object pairs in human occipitotemporal cortex: the weighted average as a general rule. Neuroimage. 2012; 70:37-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.023. View

2.
Taubert J, Ritchie J, Ungerleider L, Baker C . One object, two networks? Assessing the relationship between the face and body-selective regions in the primate visual system. Brain Struct Funct. 2021; 227(4):1423-1438. DOI: 10.1007/s00429-021-02420-7. View

3.
Walbrin J, Koldewyn K . Dyadic interaction processing in the posterior temporal cortex. Neuroimage. 2019; 198:296-302. PMC: 6610332. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.027. View

4.
Gandolfo M, Abassi E, Balgova E, Downing P, Papeo L, Koldewyn K . Converging evidence that left extrastriate body area supports visual sensitivity to social interactions. Curr Biol. 2024; 34(2):343-351.e5. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.12.009. View

5.
Atkinson A, Vuong Q, Smithson H . Modulation of the face- and body-selective visual regions by the motion and emotion of point-light face and body stimuli. Neuroimage. 2011; 59(2):1700-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.073. View