» Articles » PMID: 27259296

Steering Intermediate Courses: Desert Ants Combine Information from Various Navigational Routines

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2016 Jun 5
PMID 27259296
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A number of systems of navigation have been studied in some detail in insects. These include path integration, a system that keeps track of the straight-line distance and direction travelled on the current trip, the use of panoramic landmarks and scenery for orientation, and systematic searching. A traditional view is that only one navigational system is in operation at any one time, with different systems running in sequence depending on the context and conditions. We review selected data suggesting that often, different navigational cues (e.g., compass cues) and different systems of navigation are in operation simultaneously in desert ant navigation. The evidence suggests that all systems operate in parallel forming a heterarchical network. External and internal conditions determine the weights to be accorded to each cue and system. We also show that a model of independent modules feeding into a central summating device, the Navinet model, can in principle account for such data. No central executive processor is necessary aside from a weighted summation of the different cues and systems. Such a heterarchy of parallel systems all in operation represents a new view of insect navigation that has already been expressed informally by some authors.

Citing Articles

I2Bot: an open-source tool for multi-modal and embodied simulation of insect navigation.

Sun X, Mangan M, Peng J, Yue S J R Soc Interface. 2025; 22(222):20240586.

PMID: 39837486 PMC: 11750368. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0586.


butterflies use wide-field landscape features, but not individual local landmarks, during spatial learning.

Moura P, Cardoso M, Montgomery S R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(11):241097.

PMID: 39507999 PMC: 11539145. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.241097.


Desert Ant () Dumpers Learn from Experience to Improve Waste Disposal and Show Spatial Fidelity.

Deeti S, Cheng K Insects. 2024; 15(10).

PMID: 39452390 PMC: 11508993. DOI: 10.3390/insects15100814.


Walk this way: modeling foraging ant dynamics in multiple food source environments.

Hartman S, Ryan S, Karamched B J Math Biol. 2024; 89(4):41.

PMID: 39266783 PMC: 11392994. DOI: 10.1007/s00285-024-02136-2.


Effect of repetition of vertical and horizontal routes on navigation performance in Australian bull ants.

Lionetti V, Cheng K, Murray T Learn Behav. 2023; 52(1):92-104.

PMID: 38052764 PMC: 10923747. DOI: 10.3758/s13420-023-00614-z.


References
1.
Pouget A, Beck J, Ma W, Latham P . Probabilistic brains: knowns and unknowns. Nat Neurosci. 2013; 16(9):1170-8. PMC: 4487650. DOI: 10.1038/nn.3495. View

2.
Buhlmann C, Cheng K, Wehner R . Vector-based and landmark-guided navigation in desert ants inhabiting landmark-free and landmark-rich environments. J Exp Biol. 2011; 214(Pt 17):2845-53. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.054601. View

3.
Graham P, Cheng K . Which portion of the natural panorama is used for view-based navigation in the Australian desert ant?. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2009; 195(7):681-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-009-0443-6. View

4.
Bisch-Knaden S, Wehner R . Egocentric information helps desert ants to navigate around familiar obstacles. J Exp Biol. 2002; 204(Pt 24):4177-84. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.204.24.4177. View

5.
Wittlinger M, Wehner R, Wolf H . The desert ant odometer: a stride integrator that accounts for stride length and walking speed. J Exp Biol. 2007; 210(Pt 2):198-207. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02657. View