» Articles » PMID: 29483254

Optimal Multiguidance Integration in Insect Navigation

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2018 Feb 28
PMID 29483254
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the last decades, desert ants have become model organisms for the study of insect navigation. In finding their way, they use two major navigational routines: path integration using a celestial compass and landmark guidance based on sets of panoramic views of the terrestrial environment. It has been claimed that this information would enable the insect to acquire and use a centralized cognitive map of its foraging terrain. Here, we present a decentralized architecture, in which the concurrently operating path integration and landmark guidance routines contribute optimally to the directions to be steered, with "optimal" meaning maximizing the certainty (reliability) of the combined information. At any one time during its journey, the animal computes a path integration (global) vector and landmark guidance (local) vector, in which the length of each vector is proportional to the certainty of the individual estimates. Hence, these vectors represent the limited knowledge that the navigator has at any one place about the direction of the goal. The sum of the global and local vectors indicates the navigator's optimal directional estimate. Wherever applied, this decentralized model architecture is sufficient to simulate the results of quite a number of diverse cue-conflict experiments, which have recently been performed in various behavioral contexts by different authors in both desert ants and honeybees. They include even those experiments that have deliberately been designed by former authors to strengthen the evidence for a metric cognitive map in bees.

Citing Articles

Path integration and optic flow in flying insects: a review of current evidence.

Egelhaaf M, Lindemann J J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2025; .

PMID: 40053081 DOI: 10.1007/s00359-025-01734-9.


Coming home: how visually navigating ants (Myrmecia spp.) pinpoint their nest.

Zeil J J Exp Biol. 2025; 228(2).

PMID: 39866147 PMC: 11832129. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.249499.


Adaptive Route Memory Sequences for Insect-Inspired Visual Route Navigation.

Kagioulis E, Knight J, Graham P, Nowotny T, Philippides A Biomimetics (Basel). 2024; 9(12).

PMID: 39727735 PMC: 11673725. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics9120731.


Vector-based navigation in desert ants: the significance of path-integration vectors.

Voegeli B, Sommer S, Knaden M, Wehner R J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39625532 DOI: 10.1007/s00359-024-01725-2.


Desert Ant () Dumpers Learn from Experience to Improve Waste Disposal and Show Spatial Fidelity.

Deeti S, Cheng K Insects. 2024; 15(10).

PMID: 39452390 PMC: 11508993. DOI: 10.3390/insects15100814.


References
1.
Andel D, Wehner R . Path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis: how to make a homing ant run away from home. Proc Biol Sci. 2004; 271(1547):1485-9. PMC: 1691744. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2749. View

2.
Wehner R, Muller M . The significance of direct sunlight and polarized skylight in the ant's celestial system of navigation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(33):12575-9. PMC: 1567920. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0604430103. View

3.
Heinze S . Neuroethology: unweaving the senses of direction. Curr Biol. 2015; 25(21):R1034-R1037. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.09.003. View

4.
Cheung A, Vickerstaff R . Finding the way with a noisy brain. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010; 6(11):e1000992. PMC: 2978673. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000992. View

5.
Fleischmann P, Christian M, Muller V, Rossler W, Wehner R . Ontogeny of learning walks and the acquisition of landmark information in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. J Exp Biol. 2016; 219(Pt 19):3137-3145. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.140459. View