» Articles » PMID: 38028880

Anti-inflammatory, Antioxidant, and Wound-Healing Effects of Photobiomodulation on Type-2 Diabetic Rats

Overview
Date 2023 Nov 29
PMID 38028880
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the current study, the effects of photobiomodulation (PBM) treatments were examined based on biomechanical and histological criteria and mRNA levels of catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and NADPH oxidase (NOX) 1 and 4 in a postponed, ischemic, and infected wound repair model (DIIWHM) in rats with type 2 diabetes (DM2) during the inflammation (day 4) and proliferation (day 8) stages. To study ischemic wound repair in a diabetic rat model (DIIWHM), 24 rats with type-2 diabetes were randomly divided into four groups and infected with methicillin-resistant (MRSA). The control groups consisted of CG4 (control group on day 4) and CG8 (control group on day 8), while the PBM groups comprised PBM (PBM treatment group on day 4) and PBM (PBM treatment group on day 8). These group assignments allowed for comparisons between the control groups and the PBM-treated groups at their respective time points during the study. On days 4 and 8 of wound restoration, the PBM and PBM groups showed substantially modulated inflammatory responses and improved formation of fibroblast tissue compared with the CG groups (<0.05). Concurrently, the effects of PBM were significantly superior to those of PBM (<0.05). The antioxidant results on days 4 and 8 revealed substantial increases in CAT and SOD in the PBM groups compared with the CGs (<0.05). Substantial decreases were observed in the antioxidant agents NOX1 and NOX4 of the PBM and PBM groups compared with both CGgroups (<0.05). PBM treatments significantly sped up the inflammatory and proliferating processes in a DHIIWM in DM2 animals by modifying the inflammatory reaction and boosting fibroblast proliferation. Overall, the current findings indicated substantially better results in the PBM groups than in the CG groups.

Citing Articles

Effects of Photobiomodulation Using Low-Power Diode Laser Therapy and Nano-bone on Mandibular Bone Regeneration in Rats.

Mohamed Abdelgawad L, Mohamed K, Zaky A J Lasers Med Sci. 2024; 15:e50.

PMID: 39450001 PMC: 11499962. DOI: 10.34172/jlms.2024.50.

References
1.
Moradi A, Zare F, Mostafavinia A, Safaju S, Shahbazi A, Habibi M . Photobiomodulation plus Adipose-derived Stem Cells Improve Healing of Ischemic Infected Wounds in Type 2 Diabetic Rats. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):1206. PMC: 6985227. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-58099-z. View

2.
Mostafavinia A, Amini A, Sajadi E, Ahmadi H, Rezaei F, Ghoreishi S . Photobiomodulation therapy was more effective than photobiomodulation plus arginine on accelerating wound healing in an animal model of delayed healing wound. Lasers Med Sci. 2021; 37(1):403-415. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-021-03271-8. View

3.
Wang Z, Li H, Zhang D, Liu X, Zhao F, Pang X . Effect of advanced glycosylation end products on apoptosis in human adipose tissue-derived stem cells in vitro. Cell Biosci. 2015; 5:3. PMC: 4429817. DOI: 10.1186/2045-3701-5-3. View

4.
Apelqvist J, Bakker K, van Houtum W, Nabuurs-Franssen M, Schaper N . International consensus and practical guidelines on the management and the prevention of the diabetic foot. International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2000; 16 Suppl 1:S84-92. DOI: 10.1002/1520-7560(200009/10)16:1+<::aid-dmrr113>3.0.co;2-s. View

5.
Kasiya M, Manganda G, Heyes S, Kachapila R, Kaduya L, Chilamba J . The challenge of diabetic foot care: Review of the literature and experience at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital in Blantyre, Malawi. Malawi Med J. 2017; 29(2):218-223. PMC: 5610299. DOI: 10.4314/mmj.v29i2.26. View