» Articles » PMID: 38016644

Brain Size Predicts Bees' Tolerance to Urban Environments

Overview
Journal Biol Lett
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Nov 28
PMID 38016644
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The rapid conversion of natural habitats to anthropogenic landscapes is threatening insect pollinators worldwide, raising concern regarding the negative consequences on their fundamental role as plant pollinators. However, not all pollinators are negatively affected by habitat conversion, as certain species find appropriate resources in anthropogenic landscapes to persist and proliferate. The reason why some species tolerate anthropogenic environments while most find them inhospitable remains poorly understood. The cognitive buffer hypothesis, widely supported in vertebrates but untested in insects, offers a potential explanation. This theory suggests that species with larger brains have enhanced behavioural plasticity, enabling them to confront and adapt to novel challenges. To investigate this hypothesis in insects, we measured brain size for 89 bee species, and evaluated their association with the degree of habitat occupancy. Our analyses revealed that bee species mainly found in urban habitats had larger brains relative to their body size than those that tend to occur in forested or agricultural habitats. Additionally, urban bees exhibited larger body sizes and, consequently, larger absolute brain sizes. Our results provide the first empirical support for the cognitive buffer hypothesis in invertebrates, suggesting that a large brain in bees could confer behavioural advantages to tolerate urban environments.

Citing Articles

Evolutionary-developmental (evo-devo) dynamics of hominin brain size.

Gonzalez-Forero M Nat Hum Behav. 2024; 8(7):1321-1333.

PMID: 38802541 PMC: 11272587. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-01887-8.


Brain size predicts bees' tolerance to urban environments.

Lanuza J, Collado M, Sayol F, Sol D, Bartomeus I Biol Lett. 2023; 19(11):20230296.

PMID: 38016644 PMC: 10684341. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2023.0296.

References
1.
Amiel J, Tingley R, Shine R . Smart moves: effects of relative brain size on establishment success of invasive amphibians and reptiles. PLoS One. 2011; 6(4):e18277. PMC: 3071803. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018277. View

2.
Hedtke S, Patiny S, Danforth B . The bee tree of life: a supermatrix approach to apoid phylogeny and biogeography. BMC Evol Biol. 2013; 13:138. PMC: 3706286. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-138. View

3.
Scheper J, Reemer M, van Kats R, Ozinga W, van der Linden G, Schaminee J . Museum specimens reveal loss of pollen host plants as key factor driving wild bee decline in The Netherlands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(49):17552-7. PMC: 4267333. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1412973111. View

4.
Santini L, Gonzalez-Suarez M, Russo D, Gonzalez-Voyer A, Von Hardenberg A, Ancillotto L . One strategy does not fit all: determinants of urban adaptation in mammals. Ecol Lett. 2018; 22(2):365-376. PMC: 7379640. DOI: 10.1111/ele.13199. View

5.
Theodorou P, Radzeviciute R, Lentendu G, Kahnt B, Husemann M, Bleidorn C . Urban areas as hotspots for bees and pollination but not a panacea for all insects. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):576. PMC: 6989530. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-14496-6. View