» Articles » PMID: 17483965

Bee Foraging Ranges and Their Relationship to Body Size

Overview
Journal Oecologia
Date 2007 May 8
PMID 17483965
Citations 286
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bees are the most important pollinator taxon; therefore, understanding the scale at which they forage has important ecological implications and conservation applications. The foraging ranges for most bee species are unknown. Foraging distance information is critical for understanding the scale at which bee populations respond to the landscape, assessing the role of bee pollinators in affecting plant population structure, planning conservation strategies for plants, and designing bee habitat refugia that maintain pollination function for wild and crop plants. We used data from 96 records of 62 bee species to determine whether body size predicts foraging distance. We regressed maximum and typical foraging distances on body size and found highly significant and explanatory nonlinear relationships. We used a second data set to: (1) compare observed reports of foraging distance to the distances predicted by our regression equations and (2) assess the biases inherent to the different techniques that have been used to assess foraging distance. The equations we present can be used to predict foraging distances for many bee species, based on a simple measurement of body size.

Citing Articles

Wild Foundress Queen Bumble Bees Make Numerous, Short Foraging Trips and Exhibit Frequent Nest Failure: Insights From Trap-Nesting and RFID Tracking.

Gustilo E, Grover W, Woodard S Ecol Evol. 2025; 15(2):e71016.

PMID: 39991447 PMC: 11843468. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.71016.


Landscape conservation and orchard management influence carob tree yield through changes in pollinator communities.

Gomez-Martinez C, Gonzalez-Estevez M, deCastro-Arrazola I, Unglaub P, Lazaro A PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0307357.

PMID: 39951454 PMC: 11828422. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307357.


Wild Bee Assemblages and Pollination Networks of Managed Emergent Wetlands in Central New York, USA.

Jacobson M, Schummer M, Fierke M, Chesshire P, Leopold D Ecol Evol. 2025; 15(2):e70847.

PMID: 39911414 PMC: 11795061. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70847.


Morphological Comparisons of Adult Worker Bees Developed in Chinese and Italian Honey Bee Combs.

Yang S, Li H, Wu P, Yue D, Guo Y, Zhao W Insects. 2025; 16(1.

PMID: 39859685 PMC: 11766152. DOI: 10.3390/insects16010104.


Habitat Restorations in an Urban Landscape Rapidly Assemble Diverse Pollinator Communities That Persist.

Ulrich J, Sargent R Ecol Lett. 2024; 28(1):e70037.

PMID: 39737676 PMC: 11687344. DOI: 10.1111/ele.70037.


References
1.
Ricketts T . The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am Nat. 2008; 158(1):87-99. DOI: 10.1086/320863. View

2.
Campbell D . POLLEN AND GENE DISPERSAL: THE INFLUENCES OF COMPETITION FOR POLLINATION. Evolution. 2017; 39(2):418-431. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb05678.x. View

3.
Kelt D, Van Vuren D . The ecology and macroecology of mammalian home range area. Am Nat. 2008; 157(6):637-45. DOI: 10.1086/320621. View

4.
Jetz W, Carbone C, Fulford J, Brown J . The scaling of animal space use. Science. 2004; 306(5694):266-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1102138. View

5.
Ritchie M, Olff H . Spatial scaling laws yield a synthetic theory of biodiversity. Nature. 1999; 400(6744):557-60. DOI: 10.1038/23010. View