Locked Tension Band Wiring: A Modified Technique for Olecranon Fractures-A Multicenter Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes and Complications with Conventional Methods

Overview

Journal Indian J Orthop

Publisher Springer Nature

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2023 Nov 27

PMID 38009177

Authors

Yutaro Kuwahara

Yasuhiko Takegami

So Mitsuya

Katsuhiro Tokutake

Kenichi Yamauchi

Shiro Imagama

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Tension band wiring is the standard treatment for olecranon fractures, but it is associated with high rate of implant-related complication. To reduce this high complication rate, we developed a modified technique, locked tension band wiring (LTBW). The aim of this study was to investigate whether LTBW reduces complication and reoperation rates compared to conventional methods (CTBW).

Methods: We identified 213 olecranon fractures treated with tension band wiring: 183 were treated with CTBW, and 30 were treated with LTBW, and patients in each group were selected using propensity score matching. We evaluated operation time, intraoperative bleeding, complication and reoperation rates, the amount of Kirschner's wire (K-wire) back-out, and Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI). Complications included nonunion, loss of fracture reduction, implant failure, infection, neurological impairment, heterotopic ossification, and implant irritation. Implant removal included at the patient's request with no symptoms.

Results: We finally investigated 29 patients in both groups. The mean operation time was significantly longer in the LTBW (106.7 ± 17.5 vs. 79.7 ± 21.1 min; < 0.01). Complication rates were significantly lower in the LTBW than the CTBW group (10.3 vs. 37.9%; = 0.03). The rate of implant irritation was more frequent in the CTBW, but there was no significant difference (3.4 vs. 20.7%; = 0.10). Removal rate was significantly lower in the LTBW (41.4 vs. 72.4%; = 0.03). The mean amount of K-wire backout at last follow-up was significantly less in the LTBW (3.79 ± 0.65 mm vs. 8.97 ± 3.54 mm; < 0.01). There were no significant differences in mean MEPI at all follow-up periods (77.4 ± 9.0 vs. 71.5 ± 14.0; = 0.07, 87.4 ± 7.2 vs. 85.2 ± 10.3; = 0.40, 94.6 ± 5.8 vs. 90.4 ± 9.0; = 0.06, respectively).

Conclusion: Our modified TBW significantly increased operation time compared to conventional method, but reduced the complication and removal rate and had equivalent functional outcomes in this retrospective study.

References

Shehab D, Elgazzar A, Collier B . Heterotopic ossification. J Nucl Med. 2002; 43(3):346-53. View

Morrey B . Current concepts in the treatment of fractures of the radial head, the olecranon, and the coronoid. Instr Course Lect. 1995; 44:175-85. View

Chalidis B, Sachinis N, Samoladas E, Dimitriou C, Pournaras J . Is tension band wiring technique the "gold standard" for the treatment of olecranon fractures? A long term functional outcome study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2008; 3:9. PMC: 2265682. DOI: 10.1186/1749-799X-3-9. View

Kanda Y . Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012; 48(3):452-8. PMC: 3590441. DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2012.244. View

Sasser S, Hunt R, Faul M, Sugerman D, Pearson W, Dulski T . Guidelines for field triage of injured patients: recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2011. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2012; 61(RR-1):1-20. View

Powell A, Farhan-Alanie O, McGraw I . Tension band wiring versus locking plate fixation for simple, two-part Mayo 2A olecranon fractures: a comparison of post-operative outcomes, complications, reoperations and economics. Musculoskelet Surg. 2018; 103(2):155-160. DOI: 10.1007/s12306-018-0556-6. View

Saeed Z, Trickett R, Yewlett A, Matthews T . Factors influencing K-wire migration in tension-band wiring of olecranon fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23(8):1181-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.02.018. View

Navarro R, Hsu A, Wu J, Mellano C, Sievers D, Alfaro D . Complications in Olecranon Fracture Surgery: A Comparison of Tension Band Vs. Plate Osteosynthesis. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2022; 10(10):863-870. PMC: 9702017. DOI: 10.22038/ABJS.2021.59214.2926. View

Duckworth A, Clement N, White T, Court-Brown C, McQueen M . Plate Versus Tension-Band Wire Fixation for Olecranon Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017; 99(15):1261-1273. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00773. View

10.

Carbonell-Escobar R, Vaquero-Picado A, Barco R, Antuna S . Neurologic complications after surgical management of complex elbow trauma requiring radial head replacement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020; 29(6):1282-1288. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.086. View

11.

Horan T, Gaynes R, Martone W, Jarvis W, Emori T . CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Am J Infect Control. 1992; 20(5):271-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0196-6553(05)80201-9. View

12.

Shimura H, Nimura A, Fujita K, Kaburagi H . Comparison of the efficacy of the tension band wiring with eyelet wire versus anatomical locking plate fixation for the treatment of displaced olecranon fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2021; 29(3):23094990211059231. DOI: 10.1177/23094990211059231. View

13.

Tan B, Pereira M, Ng J, Kwek E . The ideal implant for Mayo 2A olecranon fractures? An economic evaluation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020; 29(11):2347-2352. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.05.035. View

14.

Ni X, Yuan K, Liu C, Feng Q, Tian L, Ma Z . MultiWaver 2.0: modeling discrete and continuous gene flow to reconstruct complex population admixtures. Eur J Hum Genet. 2018; 27(1):133-139. PMC: 6303267. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-018-0259-3. View

15.

Rantalaiho I, Laaksonen I, Ryosa A, Perkonoja K, Isotalo K, Aarimaa V . Complications and reoperations related to tension band wiring and plate osteosynthesis of olecranon fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021; 30(10):2412-2417. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.03.138. View

16.

Liu Q, Fu Z, Zhou J, Lu T, Liu T, Shan L . Randomized prospective study of olecranon fracture fixation: cable pin system versus tension band wiring. J Int Med Res. 2012; 40(3):1055-66. DOI: 10.1177/147323001204000324. View

17.

van der Horst C, Keeman J . Treatment of olecranon fractures. Neth J Surg. 1983; 35(1):27-9. View

18.

Kinik H, Us A, Mergen E . Self-locking tension band technique. A new perspective in tension band wiring. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1999; 119(7-8):432-4. DOI: 10.1007/s004020050015. View

19.

Kuwahara Y, Takegami Y, Mitsuya S, Tokutake K, Yamauchi K, Imagama S . Locked Tension Band Wiring for Mayo IIA Olecranon Fractures: Modified Surgical Technique and Retrospective Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes and Cost-effectiveness with Locking Plate. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2023; 28(2):205-213. DOI: 10.1142/S2424835523500224. View

20.

Charlson M, Szatrowski T, Peterson J, Gold J . Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994; 47(11):1245-51. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129-5. View