Intra- and Inter-rater Reliabilities of Skin Mechanical Properties Measured in Healthy Individuals Using Skin Elasticity Meter

Overview

Journal Ann Med

Publisher Informa Healthcare

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2023 Nov 15

PMID 37967233

Authors

Yudai Fujimoto

Yoshimi Yuri

Yuji Kato

Shota Kinoshita

Hironari Tamiya

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to establish a standardized measurement method and to examine the intra- and inter-reliabilities and absolute reliability of measuring skin mechanical properties using a skin elasticity meter (Cutometer®).

Methods: Ten healthy participated in the study. Skin mechanical properties were measured at four sites: upper arm, lower arm, upper leg and lower leg on both sides in supine position using a non-invasive skin elasticity meter by two trained different raters. The measurements include quantitative indices of the maximal distensibility (R0), elasticity (R2, R5, R7), and viscoelasticity (R6). Intra- and inter- relative reliabilities were determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (1,1) and ICC (2,1) methods, respectively. The absolute reliability was assessed via the Bland-Altman analysis. Moreover, we evaluated the minimal detectable change at a 95% confidence level (MDC95).

Results: At each site, the ICC (1,1) values were >0.90, and the ICC (2,1) values were >0.50. The Bland-Altman analysis did not reveal any fixed errors, and several sites and parameters have proportional errors.

Conclusions: In this study, intra- and inter-reliabilities were measured at "excellent" and more than "moderate" levels, respectively. However, because some proportional errors were observed, the limits of reliability agreement should be considered when using the proposed methods. We believe that the results of this study can be applied to clinical research in field of rehabilitation treatment.

Citing Articles

Evaluation and comparison of reading man flap based on different designs of angles and central axial lengths using finite element method.

Chen L, Yang X, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Xia Y Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):2803.

PMID: 39843528 PMC: 11754796. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87141-1.

Skin mechanical properties measured with skin elasticity measurement device in patients with lymphedema: Scoping review.

Fujimoto Y, Yuri Y, Tamiya H Skin Res Technol. 2024; 30(8):e13861.

PMID: 39096185 PMC: 11297454. DOI: 10.1111/srt.13861.

References

Rorteau J, Chevalier F, Fromy B, Lamartine J . [Functional integrity of aging skin, from cutaneous biology to anti-aging strategies]. Med Sci (Paris). 2020; 36(12):1155-1162. DOI: 10.1051/medsci/2020223. View

Kearney E, Messaraa C, Grennan G, Koeller G, Mavon A, Merinville E . Evaluation of skin firmness by the DynaSKIN, a novel non-contact compression device, and its use in revealing the efficacy of a skincare regimen featuring a novel anti-ageing ingredient, acetyl aspartic acid. Skin Res Technol. 2016; 23(2):155-168. DOI: 10.1111/srt.12314. View

Klimitz F, Neubauer H, Stolle A, Ripper S, Daeschler S, Aman M . Objective Burn Scar Assessment in Clinical Practice Using the Cutometer©: Introduction and Validation of a Standardized Measurement Protocol. J Burn Care Res. 2022; 44(1):95-105. PMC: 9825325. DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/irac154. View

Takahashi Y, Fujino Y, Miura K, Toida A, Matsuda T, Makita S . Intra- and inter-rater reliability of rectus femoris muscle thickness measured using ultrasonography in healthy individuals. Ultrasound J. 2021; 13(1):21. PMC: 8050162. DOI: 10.1186/s13089-021-00224-8. View

Pierard G, Lapiere C . Physiopathological variations in the mechanical properties of skin. Arch Dermatol Res (1975). 1977; 260(3):231-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF00561418. View

Kitamura K, Iwase S, Komoike Y, Ogawa Y, Utsugi K, Yamamoto D . Evidence-Based Practice Guideline for the Management of Lymphedema Proposed by the Japanese Lymphedema Society. Lymphat Res Biol. 2022; 20(5):539-547. DOI: 10.1089/lrb.2021.0032. View

Wong R, Geyer S, Weninger W, Guimberteau J, Wong J . The dynamic anatomy and patterning of skin. Exp Dermatol. 2015; 25(2):92-8. DOI: 10.1111/exd.12832. View

Rennekampff H, Rabbels J, Reinhard V, Becker S, Schaller H . Comparing the Vancouver Scar Scale with the cutometer in the assessment of donor site wounds treated with various dressings in a randomized trial. J Burn Care Res. 2006; 27(3):345-51. DOI: 10.1097/01.BCR.0000216311.61266.00. View

Mueller B, Elrod J, Distler O, Schiestl C, Mazza E . On the Reliability of Suction Measurements for Skin Characterization. J Biomech Eng. 2020; 143(2). DOI: 10.1115/1.4047661. View

10.

Biggs L, Kim C, Miroshnikova Y, Wickstrom S . Mechanical Forces in the Skin: Roles in Tissue Architecture, Stability, and Function. J Invest Dermatol. 2019; 140(2):284-290. DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2019.06.137. View

11.

Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View

12.

Cho Y, Jeon J, Hong A, Yang H, Yim H, Cho Y . The effect of burn rehabilitation massage therapy on hypertrophic scar after burn: a randomized controlled trial. Burns. 2014; 40(8):1513-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2014.02.005. View

13.

Enomoto D, Mekkes J, Bossuyt P, Hoekzema R, Bos J . Quantification of cutaneous sclerosis with a skin elasticity meter in patients with generalized scleroderma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996; 35(3 Pt 1):381-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0190-9622(96)90601-5. View

14.

Muller B, Elrod J, Pensalfini M, Hopf R, Distler O, Schiestl C . A novel ultra-light suction device for mechanical characterization of skin. PLoS One. 2018; 13(8):e0201440. PMC: 6082559. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201440. View

15.

Hashmi F, Wright C, Nester C, Lam S . The reliability of non-invasive biophysical outcome measures for evaluating normal and hyperkeratotic foot skin. J Foot Ankle Res. 2015; 8:28. PMC: 4496920. DOI: 10.1186/s13047-015-0083-8. View

16.

Bonaparte J, Ellis D, Chung J . The effect of probe to skin contact force on Cutometer MPA 580 measurements. J Med Eng Technol. 2013; 37(3):208-12. DOI: 10.3109/03091902.2013.779325. View

17.

Koo T, Li M . A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15(2):155-63. PMC: 4913118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. View

18.

Dobrev H . Use of Cutometer to assess dermal oedema in erysipelas of the lower legs. Skin Res Technol. 2016; 4(3):155-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.1998.tb00102.x. View

19.

Lee S, Cho Y, Kim L, Joo S, Seo C . The Intra-rater reliability and validity of ultrasonography in the evaluation of hypertrophic scars caused by burns. Burns. 2022; 49(2):344-352. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2022.03.016. View

20.

Draaijers L, Botman Y, Tempelman F, Kreis R, Middelkoop E, van Zuijlen P . Skin elasticity meter or subjective evaluation in scars: a reliability assessment. Burns. 2004; 30(2):109-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2003.09.003. View