» Articles » PMID: 37960974

Work-related Factors and Risk of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Multivariable Mendelian Randomization Study

Overview
Journal Brain Behav
Specialty Psychology
Date 2023 Nov 14
PMID 37960974
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The causal relationship between work-related factors and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is unclear. We used a Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the unconfounded association between work-related factors and ALS.

Methods: Univariable MR analyses were conducted to evaluate the causal effects of work-related factors on ALS. Instrumental variables from the UK Biobank on work-related factors (n = 263,615) were used as proxies. The outcome dataset used ALS (n case = 20,806, n control = 59,804) summary-level data from a large-scale genome-wide association study based on European ancestry. MR analysis used inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, and weighted median (WM) to assess causal effects and other methods of MR for sensitivity analysis. Further multivariable MR analyses were performed to explore potential mediating effects.

Results: In univariable MR, IVW methods support evidence that genetically determined job involves heavy manual or physical work (OR = 2.04, 95% CI: 1.26-3.31; p = .004) was associated with an increased risk of ALS, and the WM methods also confirm this result (OR = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.30-4.28; p = .005). No evidence of heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy was found in the results. In multivariable MR, the association was absent after adjusting for smoking and blood pressure.

Conclusions: Our MR analysis results demonstrate the potential causal relationship between jobs that involve heavy manual or physical work and ALS, which might be mediated by smoking and high systolic blood pressure.

Citing Articles

Work-related factors and risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A multivariable Mendelian randomization study.

Li M, Liao Y, Luo Z, Song H, Yang Z Brain Behav. 2023; 13(12):e3317.

PMID: 37960974 PMC: 10726785. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.3317.

References
1.
Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Haycock P, Burgess S . Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator. Genet Epidemiol. 2016; 40(4):304-14. PMC: 4849733. DOI: 10.1002/gepi.21965. View

2.
Davies N, Holmes M, Davey Smith G . Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: a guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians. BMJ. 2018; 362:k601. PMC: 6041728. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k601. View

3.
Vanacore N, Cocco P, Fadda D, Dosemeci M . Job strain, hypoxia and risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Results from a death certificate study. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2010; 11(5):430-4. DOI: 10.3109/17482961003605796. View

4.
Wu P, Zhang W, Zhang X, Zhang R . Application and interpretation of Mendelian randomization approaches in exploring the causality between folate and coronary artery disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020; 111(6):1299-1300. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa069. View

5.
Turner M, Hardiman O, Benatar M, Brooks B, Chio A, de Carvalho M . Controversies and priorities in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2013; 12(3):310-22. PMC: 4565161. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70036-X. View