» Articles » PMID: 37942019

Implementing Patient-centred Outcome Measures in Palliative Care Clinical Practice for Adults (IMPCOM): Protocol for an Update Systematic Review of Facilitators and Barriers

Abstract

: Despite the development of patient-centred or patient-reported outcome measures (PCOMs or PROMs) in palliative and end-of-life care over recent years, their routine use in practice faces continuing challenges. : To update a highly cited literature review, identify and synthesise new evidence on facilitators, barriers, lessons learned, PCOMs used, models of implementation, implementation outcomes, costs, and consequences of implementing PCOMs in palliative care clinical practice. : We will search MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, Emcare, SCI-Expanded, SSCI, ESCI, and BNI. The database search will be supplemented by a list of studies from the expert advisory committee, hand-searching of reference lists for included articles, and citations of the original review. We will include primary studies using a PCOM during clinical care of adult patients with advanced disease in palliative care settings and extract data on reported models of implementation, PCOMs, facilitators, barriers, lessons learned, costs, and implementation outcomes. Gough's Weight of Evidence Framework will be used to assess the robustness and relevance of the studies. We will narratively synthesise and tabulate the findings. This review will follow PRISMA, PRISMA-Abstract, PRISMA-P, and PRISMA-Search as the reporting guidelines. : Marie Curie. The funder is not involved in designing or conducting this study. : CRD42023398653 (13/02/2023).

Citing Articles

Unveiling the burden of COPD: perspectives on a patient-reported outcome measure to support communication in outpatient consultations-an interview study among patients.

Gronhaug L, Farver-Vestergaard I, Frolund J, Egholm C, Ottesen A Front Rehabil Sci. 2024; 5:1434298.

PMID: 39318539 PMC: 11421387. DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1434298.


Implementing patient-centred outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice for adults (IMPCOM): Protocol for an update systematic review of facilitators and barriers.

Antunes B, Barclay S, Kuhn I, Eagar K, Bausewein C, Murtagh F F1000Res. 2023; 12:224.

PMID: 37942019 PMC: 10628357. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.131479.2.

References
1.
Bradshaw A, Santarelli M, Mulderrig M, Khamis A, Sartain K, Boland J . Implementing person-centred outcome measures in palliative care: An exploratory qualitative study using Normalisation Process Theory to understand processes and context. Palliat Med. 2020; 35(2):397-407. PMC: 7897789. DOI: 10.1177/0269216320972049. View

2.
Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View

3.
Currow D, Allingham S, Yates P, Johnson C, Clark K, Eagar K . Improving national hospice/palliative care service symptom outcomes systematically through point-of-care data collection, structured feedback and benchmarking. Support Care Cancer. 2014; 23(2):307-15. PMC: 4289012. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2351-8. View

4.
ONeill J, Tabish H, Welch V, Petticrew M, Pottie K, Clarke M . Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013; 67(1):56-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.005. View

5.
Antunes B, Ferreira P . Validation and cultural adaptation of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) for the Portuguese population. BMC Palliat Care. 2020; 19(1):178. PMC: 7687758. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-020-00685-z. View