» Articles » PMID: 29091531

Measuring Patient-Centeredness of Care for Seriously Ill Individuals: Challenges and Opportunities for Accountability Initiatives

Overview
Journal J Palliat Med
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2017 Nov 2
PMID 29091531
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Patient- and family-centeredness of care is particularly important for individuals with serious illness. In this article, we describe methodological challenges of using measures of patient- and family-centeredness in accountability initiatives such as public reporting and pay for performance. We begin with background on measuring patient- and family-centered care using standardized surveys, describe evidence of the use of these measures for quality improvement, and highlight methodological challenges in the development and implementation of these measures for use in accountability. To ensure that patient- and family-centeredness is the cornerstone of public and private accountability initiatives designed to promote high-quality care to seriously ill patients, we recommend development of (1) a nationally endorsed survey instrument that assesses patient and family experiences of serious illness care across the full range of patient trajectories and care settings in which this care is provided; (2) administrative data infrastructure that allows for identification and outreach to the most knowledgeable respondents for the survey, regardless of the patient's setting of care; and (3) a broad toolkit of quality improvement approaches to ensure that as the emphasis on accountability grows, providers across settings have access to tools that can help them improve patient- and family-centeredness of care for the seriously ill.

Citing Articles

Factors Associated With Quality-of-Dying-and-Death Classes Among Critically Ill Patients.

Wen F, Chou W, Huang C, Hu T, Chuang L, Tang S JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(7):e2420388.

PMID: 38949808 PMC: 11217872. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.20388.


Implementing patient-centred outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice for adults (IMPCOM): Protocol for an update systematic review of facilitators and barriers.

Antunes B, Barclay S, Kuhn I, Eagar K, Bausewein C, Murtagh F F1000Res. 2023; 12:224.

PMID: 37942019 PMC: 10628357. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.131479.2.


Parent Priorities in End-of-Life Care for Children With Cancer.

Ananth P, Lindsay M, Mun S, McCollum S, Shabanova V, de Oliveira S JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(5):e2313503.

PMID: 37184834 PMC: 10878399. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.13503.


Dying, death and bereavement: developing a national survey of bereaved relatives.

O Coimin D, Rohde D, Foley C, OCarroll T, Murphy R BMC Palliat Care. 2023; 22(1):14.

PMID: 36823584 PMC: 9947439. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01135-2.


Charting a path to high-quality end-of-life care for children with cancer.

Ananth P, Wolfe J, Johnston E Cancer. 2022; 128(20):3586-3592.

PMID: 36006762 PMC: 9530011. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34419.


References
1.
Connor S, Teno J, Spence C, Smith N . Family evaluation of hospice care: results from voluntary submission of data via website. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005; 30(1):9-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.04.001. View

2.
Finlay E, Shreve S, Casarett D . Nationwide veterans affairs quality measure for cancer: the family assessment of treatment at end of life. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(23):3838-44. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.8534. View

3.
Mendelson A, Kondo K, Damberg C, Low A, Motuapuaka M, Freeman M . The Effects of Pay-for-Performance Programs on Health, Health Care Use, and Processes of Care: A Systematic Review. Ann Intern Med. 2017; 166(5):341-353. DOI: 10.7326/M16-1881. View

4.
Johnson K, Elbert-Avila K, Kuchibhatla M, Tulsky J . Racial differences in next-of-kin participation in an ongoing survey of satisfaction with end-of-life care: a study of a study. J Palliat Med. 2006; 9(5):1076-85. DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2006.9.1076. View

5.
Carter G, Lewin T, Gianacas L, Clover K, Adams C . Caregiver satisfaction with out-patient oncology services: utility of the FAMCARE instrument and development of the FAMCARE-6. Support Care Cancer. 2010; 19(4):565-72. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-010-0858-1. View