Public Perceptions Towards Online Health Information: A Mixed-Method Study in Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia

Overview

Journal J Healthc Leadersh

Publisher Dove Medical Press

Specialty Health Services

Date 2023 Nov 1

PMID 37908971

Authors

Turki M Alanzi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Online health disinformation is one of the key challenges faced globally. Although there are efforts to address this issue, most of the proposed solutions were ineffective or could not address it effectively. One of the key reasons for the ineffective solutions is lack of understanding on how public deal with disinformation and the different areas that could be influenced by health disinformation.

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the public perceptions towards online health information, investigate the impact of online health disinformation, and propose a framework for addressing the issue of online health disinformation.

Methods: A mixed-methods approach design is used in this study which includes a cross-sectional survey design to gather data from public; and a semi-structured interviews approach with healthcare experts to analyze the impact of online health disinformation on the society. A total of 409 Saudi residents were included for survey, and 22 health informatics experts were considered for interviews.

Results: The results revealed low digital literacy levels and poor critical analysis skills among the public resulting in poor management of health disinformation. Age and education can influence the users' perceptions about the use of various online health information evaluation techniques. Thematic analysis of the interviews identified impact in four areas including social, economic, technical, and legal fronts; and various strategies were identified for public, governments, and healthcare institutions for managing the online health disinformation.

Conclusion: The occurrence of online health-related disinformation in Saudi Arabia is high, and there is a need to implement strict regulatory framework for managing disinformation.

References

Mahmud A, Islam M . Social Stigma as a Barrier to Covid-19 Responses to Community Well-Being in Bangladesh. Int J Community Wellbeing. 2021; 4(3):315-321. PMC: 7416994. DOI: 10.1007/s42413-020-00071-w. View

Rocha Y, Moura G, Desiderio G, Oliveira C, Lourenco F, Figueiredo Nicolete L . The impact of fake news on social media and its influence on health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Z Gesundh Wiss. 2021; :1-10. PMC: 8502082. DOI: 10.1007/s10389-021-01658-z. View

Wang Y, Mckee M, Torbica A, Stuckler D . Systematic Literature Review on the Spread of Health-related Misinformation on Social Media. Soc Sci Med. 2019; 240:112552. PMC: 7117034. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112552. View

Barua Z, Barua S, Aktar S, Kabir N, Li M . Effects of misinformation on COVID-19 individual responses and recommendations for resilience of disastrous consequences of misinformation. Prog Disaster Sci. 2021; 8:100119. PMC: 7373041. DOI: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100119. View

Muhammed T S, Mathew S . The disaster of misinformation: a review of research in social media. Int J Data Sci Anal. 2022; 13(4):271-285. PMC: 8853081. DOI: 10.1007/s41060-022-00311-6. View

Pulido C, Ruiz-Eugenio L, Redondo-Sama G, Villarejo-Carballido B . A New Application of Social Impact in Social Media for Overcoming Fake News in Health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(7). PMC: 7177765. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17072430. View

Gabarron E, Oyeyemi S, Wynn R . COVID-19-related misinformation on social media: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2021; 99(6):455-463A. PMC: 8164188. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.20.276782. View

Campbell S, Greenwood M, Prior S, Shearer T, Walkem K, Young S . Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. J Res Nurs. 2021; 25(8):652-661. PMC: 7932468. DOI: 10.1177/1744987120927206. View

Ahmad A, Murad H . The Impact of Social Media on Panic During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Iraqi Kurdistan: Online Questionnaire Study. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(5):e19556. PMC: 7238863. DOI: 10.2196/19556. View

10.

Verma G, Bhardwaj A, Aledavood T, De Choudhury M, Kumar S . Examining the impact of sharing COVID-19 misinformation online on mental health. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):8045. PMC: 9109204. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-11488-y. View

11.

Islam A, Pakrashi D, Vlassopoulos M, Wang L . Stigma and misconceptions in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic: A field experiment in India. Soc Sci Med. 2021; 278:113966. PMC: 8080503. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113966. View

12.

Au C, Ho K, Chiu D . Stopping healthcare misinformation: The effect of financial incentives and legislation. Health Policy. 2021; 125(5):627-633. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.02.010. View

13.

Nan X, Wang Y, Thier K . Why do people believe health misinformation and who is at risk? A systematic review of individual differences in susceptibility to health misinformation. Soc Sci Med. 2022; 314:115398. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115398. View

14.

Suarez-Lledo V, Alvarez-Galvez J . Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(1):e17187. PMC: 7857950. DOI: 10.2196/17187. View

15.

Borges do Nascimento I, Pizarro A, Almeida J, Azzopardi-Muscat N, Goncalves M, Bjorklund M . Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews. Bull World Health Organ. 2022; 100(9):544-561. PMC: 9421549. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.21.287654. View

16.

Woolson R, Bean J, Rojas P . Sample size for case-control studies using Cochran's statistic. Biometrics. 1986; 42(4):927-32. View

17.

Sun Y, Zhang Y, Gwizdka J, Trace C . Consumer Evaluation of the Quality of Online Health Information: Systematic Literature Review of Relevant Criteria and Indicators. J Med Internet Res. 2019; 21(5):e12522. PMC: 6521213. DOI: 10.2196/12522. View

18.

Dworkin S . Sample size policy for qualitative studies using in-depth interviews. Arch Sex Behav. 2012; 41(6):1319-20. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-012-0016-6. View

19.

Greenspan R, Loftus E . Pandemics and infodemics: Research on the effects of misinformation on memory. Hum Behav Emerg Technol. 2020; 3(1):8-12. PMC: 7753404. DOI: 10.1002/hbe2.228. View

20.

Tang L, Bie B, Park S, Zhi D . Social media and outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases: A systematic review of literature. Am J Infect Control. 2018; 46(9):962-972. PMC: 7115293. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.02.010. View