» Articles » PMID: 34173443

Effects of Misinformation on COVID-19 Individual Responses and Recommendations for Resilience of Disastrous Consequences of Misinformation

Overview
Date 2021 Jun 26
PMID 34173443
Citations 94
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The proliferation of misinformation on social media platforms is faster than the spread of Corona Virus Diseases (COVID-19) and it can generate hefty deleterious consequences on health amid a disaster like COVID-19. Drawing upon research on the stimulus-response theory (hypodermic needle theory) and the resilience theory, this study tested a conceptual framework considering general misinformation belief, conspiracy belief, and religious misinformation belief as the stimulus; and credibility evaluations as resilience strategy; and their effects on COVID-19 individual responses. Using a self-administered online survey during the COVID-19 pandemic, the study obtained 483 useable responses and after test, finds that all-inclusive, the propagation of misinformation on social media undermines the COVID-19 individual responses. Particularly, credibility evaluation of misinformation strongly predicts the COVID-19 individual responses with positive influences and religious misinformation beliefs as well as conspiracy beliefs and general misinformation beliefs come next and influence negatively. The findings and general recommendations will help the public, in general, to be cautious about misinformation, and the respective authority of a country, in particular, for initiating proper safety measures about disastrous misinformation to protect the public health from being exploited.

Citing Articles

The effects of mass media messages, perceived susceptibility and self-rated health on public attitude towards COVID-19 in South Africa.

Nwachukwu C, Ajaero C, Ajaero I BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2951.

PMID: 39449001 PMC: 11505730. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20442-8.


Addressing infodemic for pandemic preparedness in the digital age: a focus on Middle Africa.

Penka M, Tangang A, Alang Wung E, Tata Kelese M, Okwen P Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1275702.

PMID: 39421813 PMC: 11484489. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1275702.


Beyond COVID: towards a transdisciplinary synthesis for understanding responses and developing pandemic preparedness in Alaska.

van Doren T, Brown R, Chi G, Cochran P, Cueva K, Eichelberger L Int J Circumpolar Health. 2024; 83(1):2404273.

PMID: 39283062 PMC: 11407410. DOI: 10.1080/22423982.2024.2404273.


Strategies and bottlenecks to tackle infodemic in public health: a scoping review.

Gentili A, Villani L, Osti T, Corona V, Gris A, Zaino A Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1438981.

PMID: 39211903 PMC: 11359844. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1438981.


Patterns of self-medication and intention to seek pharmacist guidance among older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic in Macao: a cross-sectional study.

Zheng Y, Tang P, Hu H, Ung C BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2066.

PMID: 39085834 PMC: 11293033. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19453-2.


References
1.
Hopman J, Allegranzi B, Mehtar S . Managing COVID-19 in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. JAMA. 2020; 323(16):1549-1550. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.4169. View

2.
Djalante R, Lassa J, Setiamarga D, Sudjatma A, Indrawan M, Haryanto B . Review and analysis of current responses to COVID-19 in Indonesia: Period of January to March 2020. Prog Disaster Sci. 2021; 6:100091. PMC: 7149002. DOI: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100091. View

3.
Xiao Y, Torok M . Taking the right measures to control COVID-19. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020; 20(5):523-524. PMC: 7128408. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30152-3. View

4.
Treisman M . Stimulus-response theory and expectancy. Br J Psychol. 1960; 51:49-60. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1960.tb00724.x. View

5.
Rosenberg H, Syed S, Rezaie S . The Twitter pandemic: The critical role of Twitter in the dissemination of medical information and misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic. CJEM. 2020; 22(4):418-421. PMC: 7170811. DOI: 10.1017/cem.2020.361. View