» Articles » PMID: 35194559

The Disaster of Misinformation: a Review of Research in Social Media

Overview
Date 2022 Feb 23
PMID 35194559
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The spread of misinformation in social media has become a severe threat to public interests. For example, several incidents of public health concerns arose out of social media misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Against the backdrop of the emerging IS research focus on social media and the impact of misinformation during recent events such as the COVID-19, Australian Bushfire, and the USA elections, we identified disaster, health, and politics as specific domains for a research review on social media misinformation. Following a systematic review process, we chose 28 articles, relevant to the three themes, for synthesis. We discuss the characteristics of misinformation in the three domains, the methodologies that have been used by researchers, and the theories used to study misinformation. We adapt an Antecedents-Misinformation-Outcomes (AMIO) framework for integrating key concepts from prior studies. Based on the AMIO framework, we further discuss the inter-relationships of concepts and the strategies to control the spread of misinformation on social media. Ours is one of the early reviews focusing on social media misinformation research, particularly on three socially sensitive domains; disaster, health, and politics. This review contributes to the emerging body of knowledge in Data Science and social media and informs strategies to combat social media misinformation.

Citing Articles

"Your Life, Your Health: Tips and Information for Health and Well-Being": Development of a World Health Organization Digital Resource to Support Universal Access to Trustworthy Health Information.

Muscat D, Hinton R, Kuruvilla S, Nutbeam D JMIR Form Res. 2025; 9:e57881.

PMID: 40048561 PMC: 11906094. DOI: 10.2196/57881.


Evaluation of Douyin Short Videos on Mammography in China: Quality and Reliability Analysis.

Yang H, Zhu C, Zhou C, Huang R, Huang L, Chen P JMIR Cancer. 2025; 11:e59483.

PMID: 39970367 PMC: 11864564. DOI: 10.2196/59483.


The silent pandemic of stress: impact on menstrual cycle and ovulation.

Saadedine M, Berga S, Faubion S, Shufelt C Stress. 2025; 28(1):2457767.

PMID: 39862134 PMC: 11793426. DOI: 10.1080/10253890.2025.2457767.


What Is the Attitude of Romanian Smallholders Towards a Ground Mole Infestation? A Study Using Topic Modelling and Sentiment Analysis on Social Media and Blog Discussions.

Calin A, Coroiu A Animals (Basel). 2025; 14(24.

PMID: 39765515 PMC: 11672416. DOI: 10.3390/ani14243611.


Impact of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Content Labels On Perceived Accuracy, Message Credibility, and Sharing Intentions for Misinformation: Web-Based, Randomized, Controlled Experiment.

Li F, Yang Y JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e60024.

PMID: 39719080 PMC: 11892328. DOI: 10.2196/60024.


References
1.
Wang Y, Mckee M, Torbica A, Stuckler D . Systematic Literature Review on the Spread of Health-related Misinformation on Social Media. Soc Sci Med. 2019; 240:112552. PMC: 7117034. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112552. View

2.
Shahi G, Dirkson A, Majchrzak T . An exploratory study of COVID-19 misinformation on Twitter. Online Soc Netw Media. 2021; 22:100104. PMC: 7893249. DOI: 10.1016/j.osnem.2020.100104. View

3.
Chua A, Banerjee S . To share or not to share: The role of epistemic belief in online health rumors. Int J Med Inform. 2017; 108:36-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.08.010. View

4.
Bode L, Vraga E . See Something, Say Something: Correction of Global Health Misinformation on Social Media. Health Commun. 2017; 33(9):1131-1140. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1331312. View

5.
Paek H, Hove T . Effective strategies for responding to rumors about risks: The case of radiation-contaminated food in South Korea. Public Relat Rev. 2020; 45(3):101762. PMC: 7126673. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.02.006. View