» Articles » PMID: 37884673

Simple Dietary Substitutions Can Reduce Carbon Footprints and Improve Dietary Quality Across Diverse Segments of the US Population

Overview
Journal Nat Food
Date 2023 Oct 26
PMID 37884673
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Changing what foods we eat could reduce environmental harms and improve human health, but sweeping dietary change is challenging. We used dietary intake data from a nationally representative sample of 7,753 US children and adults to identify simple, actionable dietary substitutions from higher- to lower-carbon foods (for example, substituting chicken for beef in mixed dishes such as burritos, but making no other changes to the diet). We simulated the potential impact of these substitutions on dietary carbon emissions and dietary quality. If all consumers who ate the high-carbon foods instead consumed a lower-carbon substitute, the total dietary carbon footprint in the United States would be reduced by more than 35%. Moreover, if adopted, these substitutions would improve consumers' overall dietary quality by 4-10%, with benefits projected for all age, gender, and racial and ethnic groups. These results suggest that a 'small changes' approach could be a valuable starting point for addressing diet's impact on climate and health.

Citing Articles

Modeled sustainability impacts of increasing pork consumption among adults in the United States.

Conrad Z, Repoulis V, Zavela C Front Nutr. 2025; 11:1508601.

PMID: 39897535 PMC: 11783847. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1508601.


Dietary protein considerations in a sustainable and ageing world: a narrative review with a focus on greenhouse gas emissions and skeletal muscle remodelling and maintenance.

Morgan P, Carson B, Witard O BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):1030.

PMID: 39702220 PMC: 11660970. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07945-6.


Keeping the global consumption within the planetary boundaries.

Tian P, Zhong H, Chen X, Feng K, Sun L, Zhang N Nature. 2024; 635(8039):625-630.

PMID: 39537917 PMC: 11578892. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08154-w.


Augmenting the National Nutrition Data System to Promote Diet Sustainability Analyses.

Conrad Z, DiStaso C, Korol M, Rose D Curr Dev Nutr. 2024; 8(7):103793.

PMID: 39045145 PMC: 11262171. DOI: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.103793.


The impact of an eco-score label on US consumers' perceptions of environmental sustainability and intentions to purchase food: A randomized experiment.

Smith Taillie L, Wolfson J, Prestemon C, Bercholz M, Ewoldt L, Ruggles P PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0306123.

PMID: 38935699 PMC: 11210794. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306123.


References
1.
Bornhorst C, Bel-Serrat S, Pigeot I, Huybrechts I, Ottavaere C, Sioen I . Validity of 24-h recalls in (pre-)school aged children: comparison of proxy-reported energy intakes with measured energy expenditure. Clin Nutr. 2013; 33(1):79-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.03.018. View

2.
Reedy J, Lerman J, Krebs-Smith S, Kirkpatrick S, Pannucci T, Wilson M . Evaluation of the Healthy Eating Index-2015. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018; 118(9):1622-1633. PMC: 6718954. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.05.019. View

3.
Bianchi F, Garnett E, Dorsel C, Aveyard P, Jebb S . Restructuring physical micro-environments to reduce the demand for meat: a systematic review and qualitative comparative analysis. Lancet Planet Health. 2018; 2(9):e384-e397. PMC: 6120131. DOI: 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30188-8. View

4.
Leng G, Adan R, Belot M, Brunstrom J, de Graaf K, Dickson S . The determinants of food choice. Proc Nutr Soc. 2016; 76(3):316-327. DOI: 10.1017/S002966511600286X. View

5.
Godfray H, Aveyard P, Garnett T, Hall J, Key T, Lorimer J . Meat consumption, health, and the environment. Science. 2018; 361(6399). DOI: 10.1126/science.aam5324. View