» Articles » PMID: 26109390

Offering Within-category Food Swaps to Reduce Energy Density of Food Purchases: a Study Using an Experimental Online Supermarket

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2015 Jun 26
PMID 26109390
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Swaps are often used to encourage healthier food choices, but there is little evidence of their effectiveness. The current study assessed the impact of offering swaps on groceries purchased within a bespoke online supermarket; specifically the objective was to measure the impact on energy density (ED) of food purchases following the offer of lower ED alternatives (a) at point of selection or at checkout, and (b) with or without explicit consent to receive swap prompts.

Method: Participants were asked to complete a 12-item shopping task within an online shopping platform, developed for studying food purchasing. 1610 adults were randomly assigned to a no swap control condition or to one of four interventions: consented swaps at selection; consented swaps at checkout; imposed swaps at selection; or imposed swaps at checkout. Each swap presented two lower ED options from the same category as the participant's chosen food. Swap acceptance rate and purchased food ED were the primary outcomes.

Results: Of the mean 12.36 (SD 1.26) foods purchased, intervention participants were offered a mean of 4.1 (SD 1.68) swaps, with the potential to reduce the ED of purchased food (effect (95% CI): -83 kJ/100 g (-110 - -56), p = <0.0001). A median of one swap (IQR 0 to 2) was accepted, not significantly reducing the purchased food ED (effect (95% CI): -24 kJ/100 g (4 - -52), p = 0.094). More swaps were accepted when offered at selection than at checkout (OR (95% CI) = 1.224 (1.11 - 1.35), p < 0.0001), but no differences were seen with consent. Purchased food ED was unaffected by point of swap or consent, but reduced with number of swaps accepted (effect per swap (95% CI) = -24 kJ/100 g (-35 - -14), p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Within category swaps did not reduce the ED of food purchases reflecting the observation that the use of swaps within an on-line shopping platform offered small potential gains in ED and a minority was accepted.

Citing Articles

Personalizing product sets to individual health priorities increases the healthfulness of hypothetical food choices in US adults.

Gustafson C, Gitungwa H, Boron J, Rose D Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):7981.

PMID: 40055447 PMC: 11889152. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-92784-1.


' - Australian shoppers' experiences with online grocery platforms.

Bennett R, Driessen C, Zorbas C, Sacks G, Gupta A, Cameron A Public Health Nutr. 2024; 27(1):e134.

PMID: 38742445 PMC: 11148825. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980024001046.


Simple dietary substitutions can reduce carbon footprints and improve dietary quality across diverse segments of the US population.

Grummon A, Lee C, Robinson T, Rimm E, Rose D Nat Food. 2023; 4(11):966-977.

PMID: 37884673 PMC: 10725296. DOI: 10.1038/s43016-023-00864-0.


A Systematic Review of Marketing Practices Used in Online Grocery Shopping: Implications for WIC Online Ordering.

Hodges L, Lowery C, Patel P, McInnis J, Zhang Q Nutrients. 2023; 15(2).

PMID: 36678317 PMC: 9866762. DOI: 10.3390/nu15020446.


Perceptions of social norms around healthy and environmentally-friendly food choices: Linking the role of referent groups to behavior.

Coker E, Jebb S, Stewart C, Clark M, Pechey R Front Psychol. 2022; 13:974830.

PMID: 36312106 PMC: 9611198. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.974830.


References
1.
Huang A, Barzi F, Huxley R, Denyer G, Rohrlach B, Jayne K . The effects on saturated fat purchases of providing internet shoppers with purchase- specific dietary advice: a randomised trial. PLoS Clin Trials. 2006; 1(5):e22. PMC: 1574360. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0010022. View

2.
Chiou W, Wan C, Wu W, Lee K . A randomized experiment to examine unintended consequences of dietary supplement use among daily smokers: taking supplements reduces self-regulation of smoking. Addiction. 2011; 106(12):2221-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03545.x. View

3.
Stubbs R, Ritz P, Coward W, Prentice A . Covert manipulation of the ratio of dietary fat to carbohydrate and energy density: effect on food intake and energy balance in free-living men eating ad libitum. Am J Clin Nutr. 1995; 62(2):330-7. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/62.2.330. View

4.
Johnson L, Wilks D, Lindroos A, Jebb S . Reflections from a systematic review of dietary energy density and weight gain: is the inclusion of drinks valid?. Obes Rev. 2009; 10(6):681-92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00580.x. View

5.
Waterlander W, Steenhuis I, de Boer M, Schuit A, Seidell J . Effects of different discount levels on healthy products coupled with a healthy choice label, special offer label or both: results from a web-based supermarket experiment. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013; 10:59. PMC: 3668240. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-59. View