Artificial Intelligence in Time-lapse System: Advances, Applications, and Future Perspectives in Reproductive Medicine

Overview

Journal J Assist Reprod Genet

Publisher Springer

Specialties Genetics
Reproductive Medicine

Date 2023 Oct 25

PMID 37880512

Authors

Thi-My-Trang Luong

Nguyen Quoc Khanh Le

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

With the rising demand for in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, there is a growing need for innovative techniques to optimize procedure outcomes. One such technique is time-lapse system (TLS) for embryo incubation, which minimizes environmental changes in the embryo culture process. TLS also significantly advances predicting embryo quality, a crucial determinant of IVF cycle success. However, the current subjective nature of embryo assessments is due to inter- and intra-observer subjectivity, resulting in highly variable results. To address this challenge, reproductive medicine has gradually turned to artificial intelligence (AI) to establish a standardized and objective approach, aiming to achieve higher success rates. Extensive research is underway investigating the utilization of AI in TLS to predict multiple outcomes. These studies explore the application of popular AI algorithms, their specific implementations, and the achieved advancements in TLS. This review aims to provide an overview of the advances in AI algorithms and their particular applications within the context of TLS and the potential challenges and opportunities for further advancements in reproductive medicine.

Citing Articles

Key glycometabolism during oocyte maturation and early embryonic development.

Zhang Y, Li T, Wang Y, Yu Y Reproduction. 2025; 169(3).

PMID: 39846956 PMC: 11840835. DOI: 10.1530/REP-24-0275.

Artificial intelligence powers regenerative medicine into predictive realm.

Garmany A, Terzic A Regen Med. 2024; 19(12):611-616.

PMID: 39660914 PMC: 11703382. DOI: 10.1080/17460751.2024.2437281.

Ethics of artificial intelligence in embryo assessment: mapping the terrain.

Koplin J, Johnston M, Webb A, Whittaker A, Mills C Hum Reprod. 2024; 40(2):179-185.

PMID: 39657965 PMC: 11788194. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deae264.

Non-invasive prediction of human embryonic ploidy using artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xin X, Wu S, Xu H, Ma Y, Bao N, Gao M EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 77:102897.

PMID: 39513188 PMC: 11541425. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102897.

Regulation of glucose metabolism: Effects on oocyte, preimplantation embryo, assisted reproductive technology and embryonic stem cell.

Xiong Y, Zhu H, Shi R, Wu Y, Fan Y, Jin L Heliyon. 2024; 10(19):e38551.

PMID: 39403464 PMC: 11471579. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38551.

References

Inhorn M, Patrizio P . Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century. Hum Reprod Update. 2015; 21(4):411-26. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmv016. View

Cimadomo D, Marconetto A, Trio S, Chiappetta V, Innocenti F, Albricci L . Human blastocyst spontaneous collapse is associated with worse morphological quality and higher degeneration and aneuploidy rates: a comprehensive analysis standardized through artificial intelligence. Hum Reprod. 2022; 37(10):2291-2306. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac175. View

Tejera A, Castello D, de Los Santos J, Pellicer A, Remohi J, Meseguer M . Combination of metabolism measurement and a time-lapse system provides an embryo selection method based on oxygen uptake and chronology of cytokinesis timing. Fertil Steril. 2016; 106(1):119-126.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.019. View

Bar-El L, Kalma Y, Malcov M, Schwartz T, Raviv S, Cohen T . Blastomere biopsy for PGD delays embryo compaction and blastulation: a time-lapse microscopic analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016; 33(11):1449-1457. PMC: 5125156. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0813-2. View

Kim I, Kang K, Song Y, Kim T . Application of Artificial Intelligence in Pathology: Trends and Challenges. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(11). PMC: 9688959. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12112794. View

Teramoto A . [Application of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2019; 46(3):418-422. View

Hamamoto R, Suvarna K, Yamada M, Kobayashi K, Shinkai N, Miyake M . Application of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Oncology: Towards the Establishment of Precision Medicine. Cancers (Basel). 2020; 12(12). PMC: 7760590. DOI: 10.3390/cancers12123532. View

Giscard dEstaing S, Labrune E, Forcellini M, Edel C, Salle B, Lornage J . A machine learning system with reinforcement capacity for predicting the fate of an ART embryo. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2021; 67(1):64-78. DOI: 10.1080/19396368.2020.1822953. View

Liao Q, Zhang Q, Feng X, Huang H, Xu H, Tian B . Development of deep learning algorithms for predicting blastocyst formation and quality by time-lapse monitoring. Commun Biol. 2021; 4(1):415. PMC: 7998018. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-021-01937-1. View

10.

Trolice M, Curchoe C, Quaas A . Artificial intelligence-the future is now. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021; 38(7):1607-1612. PMC: 8260235. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02272-4. View

11.

Leung A, Son W, Dahan M . Time-lapse imaging of embryos: current evidence supporting its use. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2016; 13(10):881-883. DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2016.1230015. View

12.

Wong C, Loewke K, Bossert N, Behr B, De Jonge C, Baer T . Non-invasive imaging of human embryos before embryonic genome activation predicts development to the blastocyst stage. Nat Biotechnol. 2010; 28(10):1115-21. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.1686. View

13.

Racowsky C, Kovacs P, Martins W . A critical appraisal of time-lapse imaging for embryo selection: where are we and where do we need to go?. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015; 32(7):1025-30. PMC: 4531870. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-015-0510-6. View

14.

Fan Y, Han S, Wu L, Wang Y, Huang G . Abnormally cleaving embryos are able to produce live births: a time-lapse study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016; 33(3):379-385. PMC: 4785157. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-015-0632-x. View

15.

Curchoe C, Bormann C . Artificial intelligence and machine learning for human reproduction and embryology presented at ASRM and ESHRE 2018. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019; 36(4):591-600. PMC: 6504989. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01408-x. View

16.

Malik A, Patel P, Ehsan L, Guleria S, Hartka T, Adewole S . Ten simple rules for engaging with artificial intelligence in biomedicine. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021; 17(2):e1008531. PMC: 7877652. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008531. View

17.

Wang R, Pan W, Jin L, Li Y, Geng Y, Gao C . Artificial intelligence in reproductive medicine. Reproduction. 2019; 158(4):R139-R154. PMC: 6733338. DOI: 10.1530/REP-18-0523. View

18.

Khosravi P, Kazemi E, Zhan Q, Malmsten J, Toschi M, Zisimopoulos P . Deep learning enables robust assessment and selection of human blastocysts after in vitro fertilization. NPJ Digit Med. 2019; 2:21. PMC: 6550169. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-019-0096-y. View

19.

Zou Y, Pan Y, Ge N, Xu Y, Gu R, Li Z . Can the combination of time-lapse parameters and clinical features predict embryonic ploidy status or implantation?. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022; 45(4):643-651. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.06.007. View

20.

Connor J, Martin R, Atlas L . Recurrent neural networks and robust time series prediction. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 1994; 5(2):240-54. DOI: 10.1109/72.279188. View