» Articles » PMID: 31304368

Deep Learning Enables Robust Assessment and Selection of Human Blastocysts After in Vitro Fertilization

Abstract

Visual morphology assessment is routinely used for evaluating of embryo quality and selecting human blastocysts for transfer after in vitro fertilization (IVF). However, the assessment produces different results between embryologists and as a result, the success rate of IVF remains low. To overcome uncertainties in embryo quality, multiple embryos are often implanted resulting in undesired multiple pregnancies and complications. Unlike in other imaging fields, human embryology and IVF have not yet leveraged artificial intelligence (AI) for unbiased, automated embryo assessment. We postulated that an AI approach trained on thousands of embryos can reliably predict embryo quality without human intervention. We implemented an AI approach based on deep neural networks (DNNs) to select highest quality embryos using a large collection of human embryo time-lapse images (about 50,000 images) from a high-volume fertility center in the United States. We developed a framework (STORK) based on Google's Inception model. STORK predicts blastocyst quality with an AUC of >0.98 and generalizes well to images from other clinics outside the US and outperforms individual embryologists. Using clinical data for 2182 embryos, we created a decision tree to integrate embryo quality and patient age to identify scenarios associated with pregnancy likelihood. Our analysis shows that the chance of pregnancy based on individual embryos varies from 13.8% (age ≥41 and poor-quality) to 66.3% (age <37 and good-quality) depending on automated blastocyst quality assessment and patient age. In conclusion, our AI-driven approach provides a reproducible way to assess embryo quality and uncovers new, potentially personalized strategies to select embryos.

Citing Articles

Single-centre comparative study of in vitro fertilisation and naturally conceived babies in Indonesia.

Marsubrin P, Sugiyarto K, Oswari J, Rohsiswatmo R, Roeslani R, Iskandar A BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025; 9(1).

PMID: 40050026 PMC: 11887313. DOI: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003142.


Machine learning approaches for image classification in developmental biology and clinical embryology.

Mapstone C, Plusa B Development. 2025; 152(4).

PMID: 39960146 PMC: 11883239. DOI: 10.1242/dev.202066.


Clinical Prospects for Artificial Intelligence in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Sone K, Taguchi A, Miyamoto Y, Uchino-Mori M, Iriyama T, Hirota Y JMA J. 2025; 8(1):113-120.

PMID: 39926075 PMC: 11799576. DOI: 10.31662/jmaj.2024-0197.


Application of a methodological framework for the development and multicenter validation of reliable artificial intelligence in embryo evaluation.

Gilboa D, Garg A, Shapiro M, Meseguer M, Amar Y, Lustgarten N Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025; 23(1):16.

PMID: 39891250 PMC: 11783712. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-025-01351-w.


The perception of artificial intelligence and infertility care among patients undergoing fertility treatment.

Cromack S, Lew A, Bazzetta S, Xu S, Walter J J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025; .

PMID: 39776390 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03382-5.


References
1.
Gardner D, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft W . Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000; 73(6):1155-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00518-5. View

2.
Arce J, Ziebe S, Lundin K, Janssens R, Helmgaard L, Sorensen P . Interobserver agreement and intraobserver reproducibility of embryo quality assessments. Hum Reprod. 2006; 21(8):2141-8. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/del106. View

3.
Hebert M, Collin-Vezina D, Daigneault I, Parent N, Tremblay C . Factors linked to outcomes in sexually abused girls: a regression tree analysis. Compr Psychiatry. 2006; 47(6):443-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2006.02.008. View

4.
Santos Filho E, Noble J, Wells D . A review on automatic analysis of human embryo microscope images. Open Biomed Eng J. 2011; 4:170-7. PMC: 3044885. DOI: 10.2174/1874120701004010170. View

5.
Yang Z, Liu J, Collins G, Salem S, Liu X, Lyle S . Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study. Mol Cytogenet. 2012; 5(1):24. PMC: 3403960. DOI: 10.1186/1755-8166-5-24. View