» Articles » PMID: 37876478

The Value of Metal Artifact Reduction and Iterative Algorithms in Dual Energy CT Angiography in Patients After Complex Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Overview
Journal Heliyon
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2023 Oct 25
PMID 37876478
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rationale And Objectives: Evaluation of the diagnostic value of linearly blended (LB) and virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) reconstruction techniques with and without metal artifacts reduction (MAR) and of adaptive statistical iterative reconstructions (ASIR) in the assessment of target vessels after branched/fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (f/brEVAR) procedures.

Materials And Methods: CT scans of 28 patients were used in this study. Arterial phase of examination was obtained using a dual-energy fast-kVp switching scanner. CT numbers in the aorta, celiac trunk, superior mesenteric artery, and renal arteries were measured in the following reconstructions: LB, VMI 60 keV, VMI MAR 60 keV, VMI ASIR 60 % 60 keV. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were calculated for each reconstruction. Luminal diameters (measurements at 2 levels of stent) and subjective image quality (5-point Likert scale) were assessed (2 readers, blinded to the type of reconstruction).

Results: The highest mean values of CNR and SNR in vascular structures were obtained in VMI MAR 60 keV (CNR 12.526 ± 2.46, SNR 17.398 ± 2.52), lower in VMI 60 keV (CNR 11.508 ± 2.01, SNR 16.524 ± 2.07) and VMI ASIR (CNR 11.086 ± 1.78, SNR 15.928 ± 1.82), and the lowest in LB (CNR 6.808 ± 0.79, SNR 11.492 ± 0.79) reconstructions. There were no statistically significant differences in the measurements of the stent width between reconstructions (p > 0.05). The highest subjective image quality was obtained in the ASIR VMI (4.25 ± 0.44) and the lowest in the MAR VMI (1.57 ± 0.5) reconstruction.

Conclusion: Despite obtaining the highest values of SNR and CNR in the MAR VMI reconstruction, the subjective diagnostic value was the lowest for this technique due to significant artifacts. The type of reconstruction did not significantly affect vessel diameter measurements (p > 0.05). Iterative reconstructions raised both objective and subjective image quality.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of single-energy metal artifact reduction algorithm in CT: application to contrast-enhanced CT with EVAR and coil embolization.

Mochizuki J, Oyama-Manabe N, Kato F, Takahashi H, Manabe O, Sawada A Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025; 41(2):369-376.

PMID: 39825071 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-024-03318-1.


Monoenergetic reconstructions and iodine density maps for visualization of coronary artery stents using 8-cm dual-layer detector spectral computed tomography: an phantom study.

Chen L, Pan N, Hu B, Li Y, Dong S, Zhou Y Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(10):7671-7683.

PMID: 39429615 PMC: 11485354. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-786.


Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in post-endovascular aneurysm repair endoleak detection using dual-energy computed tomography angiography.

Nowak E, Bialecki M, Bialecka A, Kazimierczak N, Kloska A Pol J Radiol. 2024; 89:e420-e427.

PMID: 39257927 PMC: 11384217. DOI: 10.5114/pjr/192115.


Performance of different cone-beam computed tomography scan modes with and without metal artifact reduction in detection of recurrent dental caries under various restorative materials.

Abesi F, Talachi F, Ezoji F Pol J Radiol. 2024; 89:e281-e291.

PMID: 39040560 PMC: 11262014. DOI: 10.5114/pjr/188257.


Angle Dependence of Electrode Lead-Related Artifacts in Single- and Dual-Energy Cardiac ECG-Gated CT Scanning-A Phantom Study.

Tarkowski P, Siek E, Staskiewicz G, Bielecki D, Czekajska-Chehab E J Clin Med. 2024; 13(13).

PMID: 38999312 PMC: 11242805. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133746.


References
1.
Ragusi M, van der Meer R, Joemai R, van Schaik J, van Rijswijk C . Evaluation of CT Angiography Image Quality Acquired with Single-Energy Metal Artifact Reduction (SEMAR) Algorithm in Patients After Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017; 41(2):323-329. PMC: 5758681. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-017-1812-0. View

2.
Grimme F, Zeebregts C, Verhoeven E, Bekkema F, Reijnen M, Tielliu I . Visceral stent patency in fenestrated stent grafting for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2013; 59(2):298-306. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.08.005. View

3.
Zopfs D, Lennartz S, Pennig L, Glauner A, Abdullayev N, Bremm J . Virtual monoenergetic images and post-processing algorithms effectively reduce CT artifacts from intracranial aneurysm treatment. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):6629. PMC: 7170914. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-63574-8. View

4.
DAngelo T, Vizzari G, Lanzafame L, Pergolizzi F, Mazziotti S, Gaeta M . Spectral CT Imaging of Prosthetic Valve Embolization after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(4). PMC: 9955456. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13040678. View

5.
van Hedent S, Grosse Hokamp N, Kessner R, Gilkeson R, Ros P, Gupta A . Effect of Virtual Monoenergetic Images From Spectral Detector Computed Tomography on Coronary Calcium Blooming. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2018; 42(6):912-918. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000811. View