» Articles » PMID: 37872562

Bifidobacterium Bifidum and Lactobacillus Paracasei Alleviate Sarcopenia and Cognitive Impairment in Aged Mice by Regulating Gut Microbiota-mediated AKT, NF-κB, and FOXO3a Signaling Pathways

Overview
Journal Immun Ageing
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2023 Oct 23
PMID 37872562
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sarcopenia is closely associated with gut dysbiosis. Probiotics alleviate gut dysbiosis. Therefore, we selected probiotics Lactobacillus paracasei P62 (Lp) and Bifidobacterium bifidum P61 (Bb), which suppressed muscle RING-finger protein-1 (MuRF1) expression and NF-κB activation in C2C12 cells, and examined their effects on muscle mass loss and dysfunction in aged mice. Oral administration of Lp, Bb, or their mix (LB) increased grip strength and treadmill running distance and time. They significantly increased muscle weight in aged mice. They also increased AKT activation, PGC1α, SIRT1, and myosin heavy chain (MyHC) expression, MyHC-positive cell population, and cell size in the gastrocnemius (GA) muscle, while FOXO3a and NF-κB activation, MuRF1, muscle atrophy F-box, and p16 expression, and NF-κBCD11c cell population decreased. Furthermore, they reduced cognitive impairment-like behavior, IL-6 expression, FOXO3a activation, and NF-κB-positive cell population in the hippocampus, GA, and colon, while hippocampal brain-derived neurotropic factor expression increased. They shifted gut microbiota composition in aged mice: they increased Akkermansiaceae and Bacteroidaceae populations, which were positively correlated with total muscle weight and MyHC expression, and decreased Odoribacteraceae and Deferribacteriaceae populations, which were positively correlated with MuRF1 and IL-6 expression. LB alleviated sarcopenia- and cognitive impairment-like symptoms more potently than Lp or Bb alone. Based on these findings, probiotics, particularly Lp, Bb, and LB, can alleviate aging-dependent sarcopenia and cognitive impairment by regulating gut microbiota-mediated AKT, NF-κB, and/or FOXO3a signaling pathways.

Citing Articles

sp. for the Attenuation of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Mice.

Olotu T, Ferrell J Microorganisms. 2025; 12(12.

PMID: 39770690 PMC: 11728176. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12122488.


Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies of gut microbiota modulation in Sarcopenia (Review).

Yuan C Oncol Lett. 2024; 29(3):104.

PMID: 39736924 PMC: 11683524. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14850.


Exploring the Relationship Between Gut Microbiota and Sarcopenia Based on Gut-Muscle Axis.

Li W, Sheng R, Cao M, Rui Y Food Sci Nutr. 2024; 12(11):8779-8792.

PMID: 39619957 PMC: 11606894. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.4550.


Identification and analysis correlation between hub genes and immune cell infiltration related to LPS-induced cognitive impairment.

Qiang W, Deng W, Song S, Pan L Heliyon. 2024; 10(17):e37101.

PMID: 39286150 PMC: 11403500. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37101.


Epigenetics of Skeletal Muscle Atrophy.

Du J, Wu Q, Bae E Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(15).

PMID: 39125931 PMC: 11312722. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25158362.


References
1.
Smith C, Woessner M, Sim M, Levinger I . Sarcopenia definition: Does it really matter? Implications for resistance training. Ageing Res Rev. 2022; 78:101617. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2022.101617. View

2.
Beeri M, Leugrans S, Delbono O, Bennett D, Buchman A . Sarcopenia is associated with incident Alzheimer's dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and cognitive decline. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021; 69(7):1826-1835. PMC: 8286176. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17206. View

3.
Meng S, Yu L . Oxidative stress, molecular inflammation and sarcopenia. Int J Mol Sci. 2010; 11(4):1509-26. PMC: 2871128. DOI: 10.3390/ijms11041509. View

4.
Kim K, Chung Y, Huh J, Park D, Cho Y, Oh Y . Gut microbiota of the young ameliorates physical fitness of the aged in mice. Microbiome. 2022; 10(1):238. PMC: 9791737. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-022-01386-w. View

5.
Borchers A, Selmi C, Meyers F, Keen C, Gershwin M . Probiotics and immunity. J Gastroenterol. 2009; 44(1):26-46. DOI: 10.1007/s00535-008-2296-0. View