» Articles » PMID: 37869745

A Review on Inertial Microfluidic Fabrication Methods

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In recent decades, there has been significant interest in inertial microfluidics due to its high throughput, ease of fabrication, and no need for external forces. The focusing efficiency of inertial microfluidic systems relies entirely on the geometrical features of microchannels because hydrodynamic forces (inertial lift forces and Dean drag forces) are the main driving forces in inertial microfluidic devices. In the past few years, novel microchannel structures have been propounded to improve particle manipulation efficiency. However, the fabrication of these unconventional structures has remained a serious challenge. Although researchers have pushed forward the frontiers of microfabrication technologies, the fabrication techniques employed for inertial microfluidics have not been discussed comprehensively. This review introduces the microfabrication approaches used for creating inertial microchannels, including photolithography, xurography, laser cutting, micromachining, microwire technique, etching, hot embossing, 3D printing, and injection molding. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods have also been discussed. Then, the techniques are reviewed regarding resolution, structures, cost, and materials. This review provides a thorough insight into the manufacturing methods of inertial microchannels, which could be helpful for future studies to improve the harvesting yield and resolution by choosing a proper fabrication technique.

Citing Articles

Recent Advances in Polymer Science and Fabrication Processes for Enhanced Microfluidic Applications: An Overview.

Alexandre-Franco M, Kouider R, Kassir Al-Karany R, Cuerda-Correa E, Al-Kassir A Micromachines (Basel). 2024; 15(9).

PMID: 39337797 PMC: 11433824. DOI: 10.3390/mi15091137.


Lab-on-Chip Systems for Cell Sorting: Main Features and Advantages of Inertial Focusing in Spiral Microchannels.

Petruzzellis I, Martinez Vazquez R, Caragnano S, Gaudiuso C, Osellame R, Ancona A Micromachines (Basel). 2024; 15(9).

PMID: 39337795 PMC: 11434521. DOI: 10.3390/mi15091135.

References
1.
Paie P, Bragheri F, Di Carlo D, Osellame R . Particle focusing by 3D inertial microfluidics. Microsyst Nanoeng. 2019; 3:17027. PMC: 6444990. DOI: 10.1038/micronano.2017.27. View

2.
Mercado-Colmenero J, Torres-Alba A, Catalan-Requena J, Martin-Donate C . A New Conformal Cooling System for Plastic Collimators Based on the Use of Complex Geometries and Optimization of Temperature Profiles. Polymers (Basel). 2021; 13(16). PMC: 8401078. DOI: 10.3390/polym13162744. View

3.
Lee W, Kwon D, Choi W, Jung G, Jeon S . 3D-printed microfluidic device for the detection of pathogenic bacteria using size-based separation in helical channel with trapezoid cross-section. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:7717. PMC: 4289896. DOI: 10.1038/srep07717. View

4.
Mou L, Jiang X . Materials for Microfluidic Immunoassays: A Review. Adv Healthc Mater. 2017; 6(15). DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201601403. View

5.
Hou X, Zhang Y, Trujillo-de Santiago G, Alvarez M, Ribas J, Jonas S . Interplay between materials and microfluidics. Nat Rev Mater. 2024; 2(5). PMC: 11237287. DOI: 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.16. View