» Articles » PMID: 37841668

Embodied Processing at Six Linguistic Granularity Levels: A Consensus Paper

Overview
Journal J Cogn
Publisher Ubiquity Press
Specialty Psychology
Date 2023 Oct 16
PMID 37841668
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Language processing is influenced by sensorimotor experiences. Here, we review behavioral evidence for embodied and grounded influences in language processing across six linguistic levels of granularity. We examine (a) sub-word features, discussing grounded influences on iconicity (systematic associations between word form and meaning); (b) words, discussing boundary conditions and generalizations for the simulation of color, sensory modality, and spatial position; (c) sentences, discussing boundary conditions and applications of action direction simulation; (d) texts, discussing how the teaching of simulation can improve comprehension in beginning readers; (e) conversations, discussing how multi-modal cues improve turn taking and alignment; and (f) text corpora, discussing how distributional semantic models can reveal how grounded and embodied knowledge is encoded in texts. These approaches are converging on a convincing account of the psychology of language, but at the same time, there are important criticisms of the embodied approach and of specific experimental paradigms. The surest way forward requires the adoption of a wide array of scientific methods. By providing complimentary evidence, a combination of multiple methods on various levels of granularity can help us gain a more complete understanding of the role of embodiment and grounding in language processing.

Citing Articles

Linguistic markedness and body specificity in parity judgments: evidence from a go/no-go task.

Beg M, Sopta V, Domijan D Psychol Res. 2024; 89(1):24.

PMID: 39565423 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-024-02062-4.


Invariant representations in abstract concept grounding - the physical world in grounded cognition.

Friedrich J, Fischer M, Raab M Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; 31(6):2558-2580.

PMID: 38806790 PMC: 11680661. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02522-3.


Brain Signatures of Embodied Semantics and Language: A Consensus Paper.

Bechtold L, Cosper S, Malyshevskaya A, Montefinese M, Morucci P, Niccolai V J Cogn. 2023; 6(1):61.

PMID: 37841669 PMC: 10573703. DOI: 10.5334/joc.237.


Articulation posture influences pitch during singing imagery.

Korner A, Strack F Psychon Bull Rev. 2023; 30(6):2187-2195.

PMID: 37221280 PMC: 10728233. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-023-02306-1.


Abstract concepts: external influences, internal constraints, and methodological issues.

Borghi A, Shaki S, Fischer M Psychol Res. 2022; 86(8):2370-2388.

PMID: 35788903 PMC: 9674746. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-022-01698-4.

References
1.
Mahon B, Caramazza A . A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. J Physiol Paris. 2008; 102(1-3):59-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.004. View

2.
Connell L . Representing object colour in language comprehension. Cognition. 2006; 102(3):476-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.02.009. View

3.
Wu L, Barsalou L . Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination: evidence from property generation. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009; 132(2):173-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.02.002. View

4.
Trujillo J, Ozyurek A, Holler J, Drijvers L . Speakers exhibit a multimodal Lombard effect in noise. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):16721. PMC: 8373897. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-95791-0. View

5.
Garcia A, Ibanez A . A touch with words: Dynamic synergies between manual actions and language. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016; 68:59-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.04.022. View