» Articles » PMID: 27542801

The Multilevel Modality-Switch Effect: What Happens When We See the Bees Buzzing and Hear the Diamonds Glistening

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2016 Aug 21
PMID 27542801
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous studies demonstrated that the sequential verification of different sensory modality properties for concepts (e.g., BLENDER-loud; BANANA-yellow) brings about a processing cost, known as the modality-switch effect. We report an experiment designed to assess the influence of the mode of presentation (i.e., visual, aural) of stimuli on the modality-switch effect in a property verification and lexical decision priming paradigm. Participants were required to perform a property verification or a lexical decision task on a target sentence (e.g., "a BEE buzzes", "a DIAMOND glistens") presented either visually or aurally after having been presented with a prime sentence (e.g., "the LIGHT is flickering", "the SOUND is echoing") that could either share both, one or none of the target's mode of presentation and content modality. Results show that the mode of presentation of stimuli affects the conceptual modality-switch effect. Furthermore, the depth of processing required by the task modulates the complex interplay of perceptual and semantic information. We conclude that the MSE is a task-related, multilevel effect which can occur on two different levels of information processing (i.e., perceptual and semantic).

Citing Articles

Examining modal and amodal language processing in proficient bilinguals: evidence from the modality-switch paradigm.

Wentura D, Shi E, Degner J Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1426093.

PMID: 39439848 PMC: 11493593. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1426093.


Embodied Processing at Six Linguistic Granularity Levels: A Consensus Paper.

Korner A, Castillo M, Drijvers L, Fischer M, Gunther F, Marelli M J Cogn. 2023; 6(1):60.

PMID: 37841668 PMC: 10573585. DOI: 10.5334/joc.231.


Assessing Interpersonal Proximity Evaluation in the COVID-19 Era: Evidence From the Affective Priming Task.

Scerrati E, DAscenzo S, Nicoletti R, Villani C, Lugli L Front Psychol. 2022; 13:901730.

PMID: 35783734 PMC: 9243638. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901730.


The Story So Far: How Embodied Cognition Advances Our Understanding of Meaning-Making.

Galetzka C Front Psychol. 2017; 8:1315.

PMID: 28824497 PMC: 5534471. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01315.

References
1.
Hald L, Marshall J, Janssen D, Garnham A . Switching Modalities in A Sentence Verification Task: ERP Evidence for Embodied Language Processing. Front Psychol. 2011; 2:45. PMC: 3132671. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00045. View

2.
Vermeulen N, Niedenthal P, Luminet O . Switching between sensory and affective systems incurs processing costs. Cogn Sci. 2011; 31(1):183-92. DOI: 10.1080/03640210709336990. View

3.
Gallese V . Motor abstraction: a neuroscientific account of how action goals and intentions are mapped and understood. Psychol Res. 2009; 73(4):486-98. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-009-0232-4. View

4.
Collins J, Pecher D, Zeelenberg R, Coulson S . Modality Switching in a Property Verification Task: An ERP Study of What Happens When Candles Flicker after High Heels Click. Front Psychol. 2011; 2:10. PMC: 3111443. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00010. View

5.
Pecher D, Zeelenberg R, Barsalou L . Sensorimotor simulations underlie conceptual representations: modality-specific effects of prior activation. Psychon Bull Rev. 2004; 11(1):164-7. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206477. View