» Articles » PMID: 26441710

Suspending the Next Turn As a Form of Repair Initiation: Evidence from Argentine Sign Language

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2015 Oct 7
PMID 26441710
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Practices of other-initiated repair deal with problems of hearing or understanding what another person has said in the fast-moving turn-by-turn flow of conversation. As such, other-initiated repair plays a fundamental role in the maintenance of intersubjectivity in social interaction. This study finds and analyses a special type of other-initiated repair that is used in turn-by-turn conversation in a sign language: Argentine Sign Language (Lengua de Señas Argentina or LSA). We describe a type of response termed a "freeze-look," which occurs when a person has just been asked a direct question: instead of answering the question in the next turn position, the person holds still while looking directly at the questioner. In these cases it is clear that the person is aware of having just been addressed and is not otherwise accounting for their delay in responding (e.g., by displaying a "thinking" face or hesitation, etc.). We find that this behavior functions as a way for an addressee to initiate repair by the person who asked the question. The "freeze-look" results in the questioner "re-doing" their action of asking a question, for example by repeating or rephrasing it. Thus, we argue that the "freeze-look" is a practice for other-initiation of repair. In addition, we argue that it is an "off-record" practice, thus contrasting with known on-record practices such as saying "Huh?" or equivalents. The findings aim to contribute to research on human understanding in everyday turn-by-turn conversation by looking at an understudied sign language, with possible implications for our understanding of visual bodily communication in spoken languages as well.

Citing Articles

Eyebrow movements as signals of communicative problems in human face-to-face interaction.

Homke P, Levinson S, Emmendorfer A, Holler J R Soc Open Sci. 2025; 12(3):241632.

PMID: 40078914 PMC: 11896710. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.241632.


Embodied Processing at Six Linguistic Granularity Levels: A Consensus Paper.

Korner A, Castillo M, Drijvers L, Fischer M, Gunther F, Marelli M J Cogn. 2023; 6(1):60.

PMID: 37841668 PMC: 10573585. DOI: 10.5334/joc.231.


The multimodal nature of communicative efficiency in social interaction.

Rasenberg M, Pouw W, Ozyurek A, Dingemanse M Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):19111.

PMID: 36351949 PMC: 9646718. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22883-w.


Acquisition of turn-taking in sign language conversations: An overview of language modality and turn structure.

Horton L, Singleton J Front Psychol. 2022; 13:935342.

PMID: 36003107 PMC: 9393527. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.935342.


Visual bodily signals as core devices for coordinating minds in interaction.

Holler J Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022; 377(1859):20210094.

PMID: 35876208 PMC: 9310176. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0094.


References
1.
Dingemanse M, Roberts S, Baranova J, Blythe J, Drew P, Floyd S . Universal Principles in the Repair of Communication Problems. PLoS One. 2015; 10(9):e0136100. PMC: 4573759. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136100. View

2.
Stivers T, Enfield N, Brown P, Englert C, Hayashi M, Heinemann T . Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(26):10587-92. PMC: 2705608. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0903616106. View

3.
Sandler W, Meir I, Dachkovsky S, Padden C, Aronoff M . The emergence of complexity in prosody and syntax. Lingua. 2012; 121(13):2014-2033. PMC: 3476057. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2011.05.007. View

4.
Clark H, Fox Tree J . Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition. 2002; 84(1):73-111. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00017-3. View

5.
de Vos C, Torreira F, Levinson S . Turn-timing in signed conversations: coordinating stroke-to-stroke turn boundaries. Front Psychol. 2015; 6:268. PMC: 4371657. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00268. View