» Articles » PMID: 37782673

Mouse Visual Cortex As a Limited Resource System That Self-learns an Ecologically-general Representation

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Oct 2
PMID 37782673
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Studies of the mouse visual system have revealed a variety of visual brain areas that are thought to support a multitude of behavioral capacities, ranging from stimulus-reward associations, to goal-directed navigation, and object-centric discriminations. However, an overall understanding of the mouse's visual cortex, and how it supports a range of behaviors, remains unknown. Here, we take a computational approach to help address these questions, providing a high-fidelity quantitative model of mouse visual cortex and identifying key structural and functional principles underlying that model's success. Structurally, we find that a comparatively shallow network structure with a low-resolution input is optimal for modeling mouse visual cortex. Our main finding is functional-that models trained with task-agnostic, self-supervised objective functions based on the concept of contrastive embeddings are much better matches to mouse cortex, than models trained on supervised objectives or alternative self-supervised methods. This result is very much unlike in primates where prior work showed that the two were roughly equivalent, naturally leading us to ask the question of why these self-supervised objectives are better matches than supervised ones in mouse. To this end, we show that the self-supervised, contrastive objective builds a general-purpose visual representation that enables the system to achieve better transfer on out-of-distribution visual scene understanding and reward-based navigation tasks. Our results suggest that mouse visual cortex is a low-resolution, shallow network that makes best use of the mouse's limited resources to create a light-weight, general-purpose visual system-in contrast to the deep, high-resolution, and more categorization-dominated visual system of primates.

Citing Articles

Human-like face pareidolia emerges in deep neural networks optimized for face and object recognition.

Gupta P, Dobs K PLoS Comput Biol. 2025; 21(1):e1012751.

PMID: 39869654 PMC: 11790231. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012751.


Decoding the brain: From neural representations to mechanistic models.

Mathis M, Perez Rotondo A, Chang E, Tolias A, Mathis A Cell. 2024; 187(21):5814-5832.

PMID: 39423801 PMC: 11637322. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.08.051.


Signatures of hierarchical temporal processing in the mouse visual system.

Rudelt L, Gonzalez Marx D, Spitzner F, Cramer B, Zierenberg J, Priesemann V PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(8):e1012355.

PMID: 39173067 PMC: 11373856. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012355.


Heterogeneous orientation tuning in the primary visual cortex of mice diverges from Gabor-like receptive fields in primates.

Fu J, Pierzchlewicz P, Willeke K, Bashiri M, Muhammad T, Diamantaki M Cell Rep. 2024; 43(8):114639.

PMID: 39167488 PMC: 11463840. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114639.


Decoding dynamic visual scenes across the brain hierarchy.

Chen Y, Beech P, Yin Z, Jia S, Zhang J, Yu Z PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(8):e1012297.

PMID: 39093861 PMC: 11324145. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012297.


References
1.
Prusky G, West P, Douglas R . Behavioral assessment of visual acuity in mice and rats. Vision Res. 2000; 40(16):2201-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00081-x. View

2.
Cadena S, Denfield G, Walker E, Gatys L, Tolias A, Bethge M . Deep convolutional models improve predictions of macaque V1 responses to natural images. PLoS Comput Biol. 2019; 15(4):e1006897. PMC: 6499433. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006897. View

3.
Michaels J, Schaffelhofer S, Agudelo-Toro A, Scherberger H . A goal-driven modular neural network predicts parietofrontal neural dynamics during grasping. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117(50):32124-32135. PMC: 7749336. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2005087117. View

4.
Knox J, Harris K, Graddis N, Whitesell J, Zeng H, Harris J . High-resolution data-driven model of the mouse connectome. Netw Neurosci. 2019; 3(1):217-236. PMC: 6372022. DOI: 10.1162/netn_a_00066. View

5.
Hubel D, Wiesel T . Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol. 1962; 160:106-54. PMC: 1359523. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837. View