» Articles » PMID: 37752080

ADVANCING THE UNDERSTANDING OF CLINICAL SEPSIS USING GENE EXPRESSION-DRIVEN MACHINE LEARNING TO IMPROVE PATIENT OUTCOMES

Abstract

Sepsis remains a major challenge that necessitates improved approaches to enhance patient outcomes. This study explored the potential of machine learning (ML) techniques to bridge the gap between clinical data and gene expression information to better predict and understand sepsis. We discuss the application of ML algorithms, including neural networks, deep learning, and ensemble methods, to address key evidence gaps and overcome the challenges in sepsis research. The lack of a clear definition of sepsis is highlighted as a major hurdle, but ML models offer a workaround by focusing on endpoint prediction. We emphasize the significance of gene transcript information and its use in ML models to provide insights into sepsis pathophysiology and biomarker identification. Temporal analysis and integration of gene expression data further enhance the accuracy and predictive capabilities of ML models for sepsis. Although challenges such as interpretability and bias exist, ML research offers exciting prospects for addressing critical clinical problems, improving sepsis management, and advancing precision medicine approaches. Collaborative efforts between clinicians and data scientists are essential for the successful implementation and translation of ML models into clinical practice. Machine learning has the potential to revolutionize our understanding of sepsis and significantly improve patient outcomes. Further research and collaboration between clinicians and data scientists are needed to fully understand the potential of ML in sepsis management.

Citing Articles

MAN VERSUS MACHINE: PROVIDER DIRECTED VERSUS PRECISION AUTOMATED CRITICAL CARE MANAGEMENT IN A PORCINE MODEL OF DISTRIBUTIVE SHOCK.

Sanin G, Cambronero G, Wood E, Patterson J, Lane M, Renaldo A Shock. 2024; 61(5):758-765.

PMID: 38526148 PMC: 11328591. DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002345.

References
1.
Long G, Yang C . A six‑gene support vector machine classifier contributes to the diagnosis of pediatric septic shock. Mol Med Rep. 2020; 21(3):1561-1571. PMC: 7003034. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2020.10959. View

2.
Singer M, Deutschman C, Seymour C, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M . The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016; 315(8):801-10. PMC: 4968574. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. View

3.
Lauritsen S, Thiesson B, Johansson Jorgensen M, Riis A, Espelund U, Weile J . The Framing of machine learning risk prediction models illustrated by evaluation of sepsis in general wards. NPJ Digit Med. 2021; 4(1):158. PMC: 8593052. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-021-00529-x. View

4.
Saraiva J, Oswald M, Biering A, Roll D, Assmann C, Klassert T . Fungal biomarker discovery by integration of classifiers. BMC Genomics. 2017; 18(1):601. PMC: 5553868. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-017-4006-x. View

5.
Tong D, Kempsell K, Szakmany T, Ball G . Development of a Bioinformatics Framework for Identification and Validation of Genomic Biomarkers and Key Immunopathology Processes and Controllers in Infectious and Non-infectious Severe Inflammatory Response Syndrome. Front Immunol. 2020; 11:380. PMC: 7147506. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00380. View