» Articles » PMID: 37724719

Increasing Averaging Beats Improves the Test Accuracy on Holter-based Late Potentials in Patients with Myocardial Infarction

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of Holter-based late potentials (H-LPs) in cases of fatal cardiac events has increased. Although the noise level of H-LP is higher than that of conventional real-time late potential (LP) recording, a procedure to reduce the noise severity in H-LP by increasing the averaging beats has not been investigated.

Methods: We enrolled 104 patients with post-myocardial infarction (MI) and 86 control participants. Among the patients, 30 reported sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), and the remaining 74 had unrecorded VT. H-LPs were measured twice in all groups to evaluate the efficacy of increasing the averaging beats for H-LPs. Thereafter, the average of LP was calculated at 250 (default setting), 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, and 800 beats.

Results: Across all three groups (MI-VT group, MI non-VT group, and control group), the noise levels significantly decreased in consonance with the increase in averaging beats. In the MI-VT group, the H-LP positive rate considerably increased with the increase in the averaging beats from 250 to 800 both at night and daytime. In the MI-VT group, the LP parameters significantly deteriorated, which led to a positive judgment corresponding to the increment of the averaged night and day beats. The H-LP positive rates were unchanged in the MI non-VT and control groups, while the LP parameters remained consistent, despite the increased averaging beats in the MI non-VT and control groups.

Conclusion: Increasing the calculated averaging beats in H-LPs can improve the sensitivity of predicting fatal cardiac events in patients with MI.

Citing Articles

Increasing averaging beats improves the test accuracy on Holter-based late potentials in patients with myocardial infarction.

Hashimoto K, Harada N, Kimata M, Kawamura Y, Fujita N, Sekizawa A Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2023; 28(6):e13089.

PMID: 37724719 PMC: 10646378. DOI: 10.1111/anec.13089.

References
1.
Kinoshita T, Hashimoto K, Yoshioka K, Miwa Y, Yodogawa K, Watanabe E . Risk stratification for cardiac mortality using electrocardiographic markers based on 24-hour Holter recordings: the JANIES-SHD study. J Cardiol. 2019; 75(2):155-163. DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.07.012. View

2.
Yoshioka K, Amino M, Zareba W, Shima M, Matsuzaki A, Fujii T . Identification of high-risk Brugada syndrome patients by combined analysis of late potential and T-wave amplitude variability on ambulatory electrocardiograms. Circ J. 2013; 77(3):610-8. DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-12-0932. View

3.
Hashimoto K, Takase B, Nagashima M, Kasamaki Y, Shimabukuro H, Soma M . A novel signal-averaged electrocardiogram and an ambulatory-based signal-averaged electrocardiogram show strong correlations with conventional signal-averaged electrocardiogram in healthy subjects: A validation study. J Electrocardiol. 2018; 51(6):1145-1152. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.10.084. View

4.
Steinberg J, BIGGER Jr J . Importance of the endpoint of noise reduction in analysis of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. Am J Cardiol. 1989; 63(9):556-60. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90898-9. View

5.
Mancini D, Wong K, Simson M . Prognostic value of an abnormal signal-averaged electrocardiogram in patients with nonischemic congestive cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1993; 87(4):1083-92. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.87.4.1083. View