» Articles » PMID: 37686200

Detection and Monitoring of Tumor-Derived Mutations in Circulating Tumor DNA Using the UltraSEEK Lung Panel on the MassARRAY System in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Abstract

Analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a potential minimally invasive molecular tool to guide treatment decision-making and disease monitoring. A suitable diagnostic-grade platform is required for the detection of tumor-specific mutations with high sensitivity in the circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) of cancer patients. In this multicenter study, the ccfDNA of 72 patients treated for advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was evaluated using the UltraSEEK Lung Panel on the MassARRAY System, covering 73 hotspot mutations in , , , , and against mutation-specific droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and routine tumor tissue NGS. Variant detection accuracy at primary diagnosis and during disease progression, and ctDNA dynamics as a marker of treatment efficacy, were analyzed. A multicenter evaluation using reference material demonstrated an overall detection rate of over 90% for variant allele frequencies (VAFs) > 0.5%, irrespective of ccfDNA input. A comparison of UltraSEEK and ddPCR analyses revealed a 90% concordance. An 80% concordance between therapeutically targetable mutations detected in tumor tissue NGS and ccfDNA UltraSEEK analysis at baseline was observed. Nine of 84 (11%) tumor tissue mutations were not covered by UltraSEEK. A decrease in ctDNA levels at 4-6 weeks after treatment initiation detected with UltraSEEK correlated with prolonged median PFS (46 vs. 6 weeks; < 0.05) and OS (145 vs. 30 weeks; < 0.01). Using plasma-derived ccfDNA, the UltraSEEK Lung Panel with a mid-density set of the most common predictive markers for NSCLC is an alternative tool to detect mutations both at diagnosis and during disease progression and to monitor treatment response.

Citing Articles

A comparative study on ctDNA and tumor DNA mutations in lung cancer and benign cases with a high number of CTCs and CTECs.

Xie J, Hu B, Gong Y, He S, Lin J, Huang Q J Transl Med. 2023; 21(1):873.

PMID: 38041139 PMC: 10691057. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04746-8.

References
1.
Boonstra P, Ter Elst A, Tibbesma M, Bosman L, Mathijssen R, Atrafi F . A single digital droplet PCR assay to detect multiple exon 11 mutations in tumor and plasma from patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Oncotarget. 2018; 9(17):13870-13883. PMC: 5862622. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24493. View

2.
Weber B, Meldgaard P, Hager H, Wu L, Wei W, Tsai J . Detection of EGFR mutations in plasma and biopsies from non-small cell lung cancer patients by allele-specific PCR assays. BMC Cancer. 2014; 14:294. PMC: 4014134. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-294. View

3.
Syed Y . therascreen® EGFR RGQ PCR Kit: A Companion Diagnostic for Afatinib and Gefitinib in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Mol Diagn Ther. 2016; 20(2):191-8. DOI: 10.1007/s40291-016-0189-0. View

4.
Rangachari D, To C, Shpilsky J, VanderLaan P, Kobayashi S, Mushajiang M . EGFR-Mutated Lung Cancers Resistant to Osimertinib through EGFR C797S Respond to First-Generation Reversible EGFR Inhibitors but Eventually Acquire EGFR T790M/C797S in Preclinical Models and Clinical Samples. J Thorac Oncol. 2019; 14(11):1995-2002. PMC: 6823139. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.07.016. View

5.
Luo J, Shen L, Zheng D . Diagnostic value of circulating free DNA for the detection of EGFR mutation status in NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2014; 4:6269. PMC: 5385820. DOI: 10.1038/srep06269. View