» Articles » PMID: 32367253

Clinical Utility of Circulating Tumor DNA As a Response and Follow-up Marker in Cancer Therapy

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2020 May 6
PMID 32367253
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Response evaluation for cancer treatment consists primarily of clinical and radiological assessments. In addition, a limited number of serum biomarkers that assess treatment response are available for a small subset of malignancies. Through recent technological innovations, new methods for measuring tumor burden and treatment response are becoming available. By utilization of highly sensitive techniques, tumor-specific mutations in circulating DNA can be detected and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be quantified. These so-called liquid biopsies provide both molecular information about the genomic composition of the tumor and opportunities to evaluate tumor response during therapy. Quantification of tumor-specific mutations in plasma correlates well with tumor burden. Moreover, with liquid biopsies, it is also possible to detect mutations causing secondary resistance during treatment. This review focuses on the clinical utility of ctDNA as a response and follow-up marker in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, colorectal cancer, and breast cancer. Relevant studies were retrieved from a literature search using PubMed database. An overview of the available literature is provided and the relevance of ctDNA as a response marker in anti-cancer therapy for clinical practice is discussed. We conclude that the use of plasma-derived ctDNA is a promising tool for treatment decision-making based on predictive testing, detection of resistance mechanisms, and monitoring tumor response. Necessary steps for translation to daily practice and future perspectives are discussed.

Citing Articles

Molecular Profiling of Endocrine Resistance in HR+/HER2-Metastatic Breast Cancer: Insights from Extracellular Vesicles-Derived DNA and ctDNA in Liquid Biopsies.

Martinez-Rodriguez A, Fuentes-Antras J, Lorca V, Lopez de Sa A, Perez-Segura P, Moreno F Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(23).

PMID: 39684756 PMC: 11641624. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252313045.


The potential role of minimal/molecular residual disease in colorectal cancer: curative surgery, radiotherapy and beyond.

Xu M, Shi T, Xu R, Chen G, He W J Natl Cancer Cent. 2024; 3(3):203-210.

PMID: 39035199 PMC: 11256684. DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2023.05.005.


Combining germline, tissue and liquid biopsy analysis by comprehensive genomic profiling to improve the yield of actionable variants in a real-world cancer cohort.

Vanni I, Pastorino L, Andreotti V, Comandini D, Fornarini G, Grassi M J Transl Med. 2024; 22(1):462.

PMID: 38750555 PMC: 11097509. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-05227-2.


Circulating tumor DNA in liquid biopsy: Current diagnostic limitation.

Liu S World J Gastroenterol. 2024; 30(15):2175-2178.

PMID: 38681986 PMC: 11045476. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i15.2175.


Variant allele frequency in circulating tumor DNA correlated with tumor disease burden and predicted outcomes in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Zhong J, Jiang H, Liu X, Liao H, Xie F, Shao B Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024; 204(3):617-629.

PMID: 38183515 PMC: 10959836. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07210-9.


References
1.
Eisenhauer E, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz L, Sargent D, Ford R . New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2008; 45(2):228-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. View

2.
Chiou V, Burotto M . Pseudoprogression and Immune-Related Response in Solid Tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33(31):3541-3. PMC: 4622096. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.6870. View

3.
Abbasi A, Westerlaan H, Holtman G, Aden K, van Laar P, van der Hoorn A . Incidence of Tumour Progression and Pseudoprogression in High-Grade Gliomas: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Neuroradiol. 2017; 28(3):401-411. PMC: 6105173. DOI: 10.1007/s00062-017-0584-x. View

4.
Chun Y, Vauthey J, Boonsirikamchai P, Maru D, Kopetz S, Palavecino M . Association of computed tomography morphologic criteria with pathologic response and survival in patients treated with bevacizumab for colorectal liver metastases. JAMA. 2009; 302(21):2338-44. PMC: 4139149. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.1755. View

5.
Peterson L, OSullivan J, Wu Q, Novakova-Jiresova A, Jenkins I, Lee J . Prospective Study of Serial F-FDG PET and F-Fluoride PET to Predict Time to Skeletal-Related Events, Time to Progression, and Survival in Patients with Bone-Dominant Metastatic Breast Cancer. J Nucl Med. 2018; 59(12):1823-1830. PMC: 6278903. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.211102. View