» Articles » PMID: 37656811

Biophysical Investigation of Interactions Between SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein and Neuropilin-1

Overview
Journal Protein Sci
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2023 Sep 1
PMID 37656811
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent studies have suggested that neuropilin-1 (NRP1) may serve as a potential receptor in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. However, the biophysical characteristics of interactions between NRP1 and SARS-CoV-2 remain unclear. In this study, we examined the interactions between NRP1 and various SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) fragments, including the receptor-binding domain (RBD) and the S protein trimer in a soluble form or expressed on pseudovirions, using atomic force microscopy and structural modeling. Our measurements shows that NRP1 interacts with the RBD and trimer at a higher binding frequency (BF) compared to ACE2. This NRP1-RBD interaction has also been predicted and simulated via AlphaFold2 and molecular dynamics simulations, and the results indicate that their binding patterns are very similar to RBD-ACE2 interactions. Additionally, under similar loading rates, the most probable unbinding forces between NRP1 and S trimer (both soluble form and on pseudovirions) are larger than the forces between NRP1 and RBD and between trimer and ACE2. Further analysis indicates that NRP1 has a stronger binding affinity to the SARS-CoV-2 S trimer with a dissociation rate of 0.87 s , four times lower than the dissociation rate of 3.65 s between NRP1 and RBD. Moreover, additional experiments show that RBD-neutralizing antibodies can significantly reduce the BF for both ACE2 and NRP1. Together, the study suggests that NRP1 can be an alternative receptor for SARS-CoV-2 attachment to human cells, and the neutralizing antibodies targeting SARS-CoV-2 RBD can reduce the binding between SARS-CoV-2 and NRP1.

Citing Articles

Risk impact of SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and spike protein on cardiac tissue: a comprehensive review.

Sery O, Dziedzinska R Physiol Res. 2025; 73(S3):S655-S669.

PMID: 39808169 PMC: 11827061. DOI: 10.33549/physiolres.935476.


Nano-Biomechanical Investigation of Phosphatidylserine-Mediated Ebola Viral Attachment via Human Gas6 and Axl.

Hou D, Mu Q, Chen W, Cao W, Zhang X Viruses. 2024; 16(11).

PMID: 39599815 PMC: 11599018. DOI: 10.3390/v16111700.


Natural Product Cordycepin (CD) Inhibition for NRP1/CD304 Expression and Possibly SARS-CoV-2 Susceptibility Prevention on Cancers.

Li T, Luo N, Fu J, Du J, Liu Z, Tan Q Microorganisms. 2023; 11(12).

PMID: 38138098 PMC: 10745444. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11122953.


Biophysical investigation of interactions between SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and neuropilin-1.

Hou D, Cao W, Kim S, Cui X, Ziarnik M, Im W Protein Sci. 2023; 32(10):e4773.

PMID: 37656811 PMC: 10510470. DOI: 10.1002/pro.4773.

References
1.
Hatcher E, Guvench O, MacKerell A . CHARMM additive all-atom force field for aldopentofuranoses, methyl-aldopentofuranosides, and fructofuranose. J Phys Chem B. 2009; 113(37):12466-76. PMC: 2741538. DOI: 10.1021/jp905496e. View

2.
Chesla S, Selvaraj P, Zhu C . Measuring two-dimensional receptor-ligand binding kinetics by micropipette. Biophys J. 1998; 75(3):1553-72. PMC: 1299830. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)74074-3. View

3.
Jawad B, Adhikari P, Podgornik R, Ching W . Key Interacting Residues between RBD of SARS-CoV-2 and ACE2 Receptor: Combination of Molecular Dynamics Simulation and Density Functional Calculation. J Chem Inf Model. 2021; 61(9):4425-4441. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00560. View

4.
Skolnick J, Gao M, Zhou H, Singh S . AlphaFold 2: Why It Works and Its Implications for Understanding the Relationships of Protein Sequence, Structure, and Function. J Chem Inf Model. 2021; 61(10):4827-4831. PMC: 8592092. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01114. View

5.
Belouzard S, Millet J, Licitra B, Whittaker G . Mechanisms of coronavirus cell entry mediated by the viral spike protein. Viruses. 2012; 4(6):1011-33. PMC: 3397359. DOI: 10.3390/v4061011. View