Alpha 2.0
Login Register
» Articles » PMID: 8008775

The Way Irrelevant Dimensions Are Processed Depends on What They Overlap With: the Case of Stroop- and Simon-like Stimuli

Overview
Journal Psychol Res
Specialty Psychology
Date 1994 Jan 1
PMID 8008775
Citations 70
Authors
S Kornblum
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

According to the dimensional-overlap model (Kornblum, 1992), irrelevant dimensions that overlap with a stimulus dimension (e.g., Stroop-type stimuli) are processed by a different stage than those that overlap with the response (e.g., Simon-type stimuli). We show that the effects of these two types of overlap are additive, thus supporting the model's hypothesis. We also show that the time course of facilitation and interference is different for these two types of overlap.

Citing Articles

Exploring the spatial interference effects elicited by social and non-social targets: A conditional accuracy function approach.

Ponce R, Lupianez J, Gonzalez-Garcia C, Casagrande M, Marotta A Br J Psychol. 2024; 116(1):69-88.

PMID: 39267579 PMC: 11724688. DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12735.

A computational account of conflict processing during mental imagery.

Wang M, Nie Q Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024; 24(5):816-838.

PMID: 39085587 DOI: 10.3758/s13415-024-01201-z.

Action-rule-based cognitive control enables efficient execution of stimulus-response conflict tasks: a model validation of Simon task performance.

Otani Y, Katagiri Y, Imai E, Kowa H Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 17:1239207.

PMID: 38034070 PMC: 10687480. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1239207.

The Impact of Speed-Accuracy Instructions on Spatial Congruency Effects.

Heuer H, Wuhr P J Cogn. 2023; 6(1):49.

PMID: 37636012 PMC: 10453986. DOI: 10.5334/joc.318.

Mechanisms and neuroanatomy of response selection in tool and non-tool action tasks: Evidence from left-hemisphere stroke.

Garcea F, Buxbaum L Cortex. 2023; 167:335-350.

PMID: 37598647 PMC: 10543550. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.06.012.

References
1.
FITTS P, DEININGER R . S-R compatibility: correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes. J Exp Psychol. 1954; 48(6):483-92. DOI: 10.1037/h0054967. View
2.
Wallace R . S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. J Exp Psychol. 1971; 88(3):354-60. DOI: 10.1037/h0030892. View
3.
FITTS P, SEEGER C . S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. J Exp Psychol. 1953; 46(3):199-210. DOI: 10.1037/h0062827. View
4.
Simon J, Rudell A . Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. J Appl Psychol. 1967; 51(3):300-4. DOI: 10.1037/h0020586. View
5.
Simon J, SMALL Jr A . Processing auditory information: interference from an irrelevant cue. J Appl Psychol. 1969; 53(5):433-5. DOI: 10.1037/h0028034. View