» Articles » PMID: 37595405

MISPEL: A Supervised Deep Learning Harmonization Method for Multi-scanner Neuroimaging Data

Overview
Journal Med Image Anal
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Radiology
Date 2023 Aug 18
PMID 37595405
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Large-scale data obtained from aggregation of already collected multi-site neuroimaging datasets has brought benefits such as higher statistical power, reliability, and robustness to the studies. Despite these promises from growth in sample size, substantial technical variability stemming from differences in scanner specifications exists in the aggregated data and could inadvertently bias any downstream analyses on it. Such a challenge calls for data normalization and/or harmonization frameworks, in addition to comprehensive criteria to estimate the scanner-related variability and evaluate the harmonization frameworks. In this study, we propose MISPEL (Multi-scanner Image harmonization via Structure Preserving Embedding Learning), a supervised multi-scanner harmonization method that is naturally extendable to more than two scanners. We also designed a set of criteria to investigate the scanner-related technical variability and evaluate the harmonization techniques. As an essential requirement of our criteria, we introduced a multi-scanner matched dataset of 3T T1 images across four scanners, which, to the best of our knowledge is one of the few datasets of this kind. We also investigated our evaluations using two popular segmentation frameworks: FSL and segmentation in statistical parametric mapping (SPM). Lastly, we compared MISPEL to popular methods of normalization and harmonization, namely White Stripe, RAVEL, and CALAMITI. MISPEL outperformed these methods and is promising for many other neuroimaging modalities.

Citing Articles

Enhancing consistency in brain imaging research for population neuroimaging.

Muetzel R Nat Protoc. 2024; .

PMID: 39672918 DOI: 10.1038/s41596-024-01117-5.


WMH Contributions to Cognitive Impairment: Rationale and Design of the Diverse VCID Study.

DeCarli C, Rajan K, Jin L, Hinman J, Johnson D, Harvey D Stroke. 2024; 56(3):758-776.

PMID: 39545328 PMC: 11850211. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.045903.


Improved prognostication of overall survival after radiotherapy in lung cancer patients by an interpretable machine learning model integrating lung and tumor radiomics and clinical parameters.

Luo T, Yan M, Zhou M, Dekker A, Appelt A, Ji Y Radiol Med. 2024; 130(1):96-109.

PMID: 39542968 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-024-01919-3.


Exploring approaches to tackle cross-domain challenges in brain medical image segmentation: a systematic review.

Yanzhen M, Song C, Wanping L, Zufang Y, Wang A Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1401329.

PMID: 38948927 PMC: 11211279. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1401329.

References
1.
Liu S, Yap P . Learning multi-site harmonization of magnetic resonance images without traveling human phantoms. Commun Eng. 2024; 3. PMC: 10898625. DOI: 10.1038/s44172-023-00140-w. View

2.
Kruggel F, Turner J, Tugan Muftuler L . Impact of scanner hardware and imaging protocol on image quality and compartment volume precision in the ADNI cohort. Neuroimage. 2009; 49(3):2123-33. PMC: 2951115. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.006. View

3.
Johnson W, Li C, Rabinovic A . Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods. Biostatistics. 2006; 8(1):118-27. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj037. View

4.
Shah M, Xiao Y, Subbanna N, Francis S, Arnold D, Collins D . Evaluating intensity normalization on MRIs of human brain with multiple sclerosis. Med Image Anal. 2011; 15(2):267-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2010.12.003. View

5.
Zuo L, Dewey B, Liu Y, He Y, Newsome S, Mowry E . Unsupervised MR harmonization by learning disentangled representations using information bottleneck theory. Neuroimage. 2021; 243:118569. PMC: 10473284. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118569. View