Cerebellar Purkinje Cell Activity Related to the Classically Conditioned Nictitating Membrane Response

Overview

Journal Exp Brain Res

Specialty Neurology

Date 1986 Jan 1

PMID 3758251

Citations 68

Authors

N E Berthier

J W Moore

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Because of the purported critical role of cerebellar lobule HVI in classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit, we recorded extracellularly from HVI Purkinje cells (PCs) during differential conditioning. Rabbits were trained using tonal conditioned stimuli (CSs) and stimulation of the periocular region as the unconditioned stimulus (US). Many PCs responded to the US, the most frequently observed response being a burst of simple spikes. PCs in HVI showed a variety of responses to CSs that were related to conditioned responses (CRs). The most frequently observed response was an increase in simple spikes correlated with CRs. The activity of many of these cells antedated CRs by 20-200 ms. A smaller proportion of cells exhibited inhibition of simple spike activity that antedated CRs. The existence of PCs that alter their firing before CRs suggests that they may be causally involved in this behavior, and in this respect they reinforce reports that lesions of HVI or its connections disrupt nictitating membrane CRs. Although complex spike activity was not generally related to the US or to CRs, a few PCs responded in relation to CRs with only complex spikes. In demonstrating CR-related activity in cerebellar PCs, this study supports theories of cerebellar learning such as those of Marr and Albus.

Citing Articles

Discrimination training affects stimulus generalization in mice during Pavlovian eyeblink conditioning.

Fiocchi F, van Dorp N, Dijkhuizen S, van den Berg M, Wong A, De Zeeuw C Front Behav Neurosci. 2024; 18:1446991.

PMID: 39247713 PMC: 11377223. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1446991.

Mesoscale simulations predict the role of synergistic cerebellar plasticity during classical eyeblink conditioning.

Geminiani A, Casellato C, Boele H, Pedrocchi A, De Zeeuw C, DAngelo E PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(4):e1011277.

PMID: 38574161 PMC: 11060558. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011277.

Synaptic mechanisms for associative learning in the cerebellar nuclei.

Broersen R, Albergaria C, Carulli D, Carey M, Canto C, De Zeeuw C Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):7459.

PMID: 37985778 PMC: 10662440. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43227-w.

Synaptic Mechanisms of Delay Eyeblink Classical Conditioning: AMPAR Trafficking and Gene Regulation in an In Vitro Model.

Keifer J Mol Neurobiol. 2023; 60(12):7088-7103.

PMID: 37531025 DOI: 10.1007/s12035-023-03528-z.

Navigating Through Time: A Spatial Navigation Perspective on How the Brain May Encode Time.

Issa J, Tocker G, Hasselmo M, Heys J, Dombeck D Annu Rev Neurosci. 2020; 43:73-93.

PMID: 31961765 PMC: 7351603. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-101419-011117.

References

Ito M, Sakurai M, Tongroach P . Climbing fibre induced depression of both mossy fibre responsiveness and glutamate sensitivity of cerebellar Purkinje cells. J Physiol. 1982; 324:113-34. PMC: 1250696. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014103. View

Gilbert P, Thach W . Purkinje cell activity during motor learning. Brain Res. 1977; 128(2):309-28. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90997-0. View

Moore J, Desmond J . Latency of the nictitating membrane response to periocular electrostimulation in unanesthetized rabbits. Physiol Behav. 1982; 28(6):1041-6. DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(82)90173-1. View

McCormick D, Steinmetz J, Thompson R . Lesions of the inferior olivary complex cause extinction of the classically conditioned eyeblink response. Brain Res. 1985; 359(1-2):120-30. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(85)91419-2. View

Thach Jr W . Somatosensory receptive fields of single units in cat cerebellar cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1967; 30(4):675-96. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1967.30.4.675. View

McCormick D, Thompson R . Cerebellum: essential involvement in the classically conditioned eyelid response. Science. 1984; 223(4633):296-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.6701513. View

Yeo C, Hardiman M, Glickstein M . Classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit. I. Lesions of the cerebellar nuclei. Exp Brain Res. 1985; 60(1):87-98. DOI: 10.1007/BF00237022. View

Ito M, Kano M . Long-lasting depression of parallel fiber-Purkinje cell transmission induced by conjunctive stimulation of parallel fibers and climbing fibers in the cerebellar cortex. Neurosci Lett. 1982; 33(3):253-8. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3940(82)90380-9. View

Miles T, WIESENDANGER M . Climbing fibre inputs to cerebellar Purkinje cells from trigeminal cutaneous afferents and the SI face area of the cerebral cortex in the cat. J Physiol. 1975; 245(2):425-45. PMC: 1330795. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010854. View

10.

Yeo C, Hardiman M, Glickstein M . Classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit. IV. Lesions of the inferior olive. Exp Brain Res. 1986; 63(1):81-92. DOI: 10.1007/BF00235649. View

11.

Fujita M . Adaptive filter model of the cerebellum. Biol Cybern. 1982; 45(3):195-206. DOI: 10.1007/BF00336192. View

12.

Marr D . A theory of cerebellar cortex. J Physiol. 1969; 202(2):437-70. PMC: 1351491. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008820. View

13.

Yeo C, Hardiman M, Glickstein M . Classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit. III. Connections of cerebellar lobule HVI. Exp Brain Res. 1985; 60(1):114-26. DOI: 10.1007/BF00237024. View

14.

Rosenfield M, Moore J . Red nucleus lesions disrupt the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response in rabbits. Behav Brain Res. 1983; 10(2-3):393-8. DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(83)90043-8. View

15.

Miles T, WIESENDANGER M . Organization of climbing fibre projections to the cerebellar cortex from trigeminal cutaneous afferents and from the SI face area of the cerebral cortex in the cat. J Physiol. 1975; 245(2):409-24. PMC: 1330794. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010853. View

16.

McCormick D, Guyer P, Thompson R . Superior cerebellar peduncle lesions selectively abolish the ipsilateral classically conditioned nictitating membrane/eyelid response of the rabbit. Brain Res. 1982; 244(2):347-50. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(82)90095-6. View

17.

Ikeda M . Projections from the spinal and the principal sensory nuclei of the trigeminal nerve to the cerebellar cortex in the cat, as studied by retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase. J Comp Neurol. 1979; 184(3):567-85. DOI: 10.1002/cne.901840309. View

18.

Rosenfield M, Moore J . Red nucleus lesions impair acquisition of the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response but not eye-to-eye savings or unconditioned response amplitude. Behav Brain Res. 1985; 17(1):77-81. DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(85)90010-5. View

19.

Buchtel H, IOSIF G, Marchesi G, PROVINI L, Strata P . Analysis of the activity evoked in the cerebellar cortex by stimulation of the visual pathways. Exp Brain Res. 1972; 15(3):278-88. DOI: 10.1007/BF00235912. View

20.

Freeman J . Responses of cat cerebellar Purkinje cells to convergent inputs from cerebral cortex and peripheral sensory systems. J Neurophysiol. 1970; 33(6):697-712. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1970.33.6.697. View