» Articles » PMID: 24985239

Spike-coding Mechanisms of Cerebellar Temporal Processing in Classical Conditioning and Voluntary Movements

Overview
Journal Cerebellum
Publisher Springer
Specialty Neurology
Date 2014 Jul 3
PMID 24985239
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Time is a fundamental and critical factor in daily life. Millisecond timing, which is the underlying temporal processing for speaking, dancing, and other activities, is reported to rely on the cerebellum. In this review, we discuss the cerebellar spike-coding mechanisms for temporal processing. Although the contribution of the cerebellum to both classical conditioning and voluntary movements is well known, the difference of the mechanisms for temporal processing between classical conditioning and voluntary movements is not clear. Therefore, we review the evidence of cerebellar temporal processing in studies of classical conditioning and voluntary movements and report the similarities and differences between them. From some studies, which used tasks that can change some of the temporal properties (e.g., the duration of interstimulus intervals) with keeping identical movements, we concluded that classical conditioning and voluntary movements may share a common spike-coding mechanism because simple spikes in Purkinje cells decrease at predicted times for responses regardless of the intervals between responses or stimulation.

Citing Articles

Inactivation of Cerebellar Cortical Crus II Disrupts Temporal Processing of Absolute Timing but not Relative Timing in Voluntary Movements.

Yamaguchi K, Sakurai Y Front Syst Neurosci. 2016; 10:16.

PMID: 26941621 PMC: 4764692. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2016.00016.

References
1.
Clark G, McCormick D, Lavond D, Thompson R . Effects of lesions of cerebellar nuclei on conditioned behavioral and hippocampal neuronal responses. Brain Res. 1984; 291(1):125-36. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(84)90658-9. View

2.
Yamaguchi K, Sakurai Y . Novel behavioral tasks to explore cerebellar temporal processing in milliseconds in rats. Behav Brain Res. 2014; 263:138-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.01.030. View

3.
Tomlinson S, Davis N, Bracewell R . Brain stimulation studies of non-motor cerebellar function: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013; 37(5):766-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.03.001. View

4.
McCormick D, Thompson R . Cerebellum: essential involvement in the classically conditioned eyelid response. Science. 1984; 223(4633):296-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.6701513. View

5.
Trigo J, Gruart A, Delgado-Garcia J . Discharge profiles of abducens, accessory abducens, and orbicularis oculi motoneurons during reflex and conditioned blinks in alert cats. J Neurophysiol. 1999; 81(4):1666-84. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1999.81.4.1666. View