» Articles » PMID: 37578112

Circulating White Blood Cell Traits and Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Mendelian Randomisation Study

Abstract

Observational studies have suggested a protective role for eosinophils in colorectal cancer (CRC) development and implicated neutrophils, but the causal relationships remain unclear. Here, we aimed to estimate the causal effect of circulating white blood cell (WBC) counts (N = ~550 000) for basophils, eosinophils, monocytes, lymphocytes and neutrophils on CRC risk (N = 52 775 cases and 45 940 controls) using Mendelian randomisation (MR). For comparison, we also examined this relationship using individual-level data from UK Biobank (4043 incident CRC cases and 332 773 controls) in a longitudinal cohort analysis. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) MR analysis suggested a protective effect of increased basophil count and eosinophil count on CRC risk [OR per 1-SD increase: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.78-0.99, P = .04; OR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.88-0.98, P = .01]. The protective effect of eosinophils remained [OR per 1-SD increase: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.80-0.97, P = .01] following adjustments for all other WBC subtypes, to account for genetic correlation between the traits, using multivariable MR. A protective effect of increased lymphocyte count on CRC risk was also found [OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.76-0.93, P = 6.70e-4] following adjustment. Consistent with MR results, a protective effect for eosinophils in the cohort analysis in the fully adjusted model [RR per 1-SD increase: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-0.99, P = .02] and following adjustment for the other WBC subtypes [RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-0.99, P = .001] was observed. Our study implicates peripheral blood immune cells, in particular eosinophils and lymphocytes, in CRC development, highlighting a need for mechanistic studies to interrogate these relationships.

Citing Articles

Gut microbiota, immune cell, colorectal cancer association mediators: a Mendelian randomization study.

Li Y, Zhuang M, Mei S, Hu G, Zhang J, Qiu W BMC Cancer. 2025; 25(1):396.

PMID: 40038645 PMC: 11881383. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-025-13574-6.


Complete blood counts as potential risk factors of early dissemination to liver and lungs in resected colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Popeda M, Zok J, Tomasik B, Duchnowska R, Bienkowski M Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025; 40(1):21.

PMID: 39836241 PMC: 11750913. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-024-04802-9.


Genetically Predicted Immune Cell Traits Mediate the Causal Association Between Plasma Metabolites and Colorectal Cancer.

Zhu L, Ning Q, Xue J, Huang S, Chen X, Qiu X J Cancer. 2025; 16(2):430-444.

PMID: 39744475 PMC: 11685676. DOI: 10.7150/jca.101011.


Causal relationship between 41 inflammatory factors, circulating white blood cells, and pruritus: A 2-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.

Zheng K, Wang S, Zeng L, Li Y, Hu K Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(50):e40894.

PMID: 39686490 PMC: 11651462. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040894.


Deciphering the causal landscape: genetic insights into sporadic vestibular schwannoma risk factors through Mendelian Randomization.

Liu Y, Feng H, Ma H, Li J, Yu Y, Zhao H Discov Oncol. 2024; 15(1):737.

PMID: 39621164 PMC: 11612107. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-024-01644-3.


References
1.
Varricchi G, Galdiero M, Loffredo S, Lucarini V, Marone G, Mattei F . Eosinophils: The unsung heroes in cancer?. Oncoimmunology. 2018; 7(2):e1393134. PMC: 5749653. DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1393134. View

2.
Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Haycock P, Burgess S . Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator. Genet Epidemiol. 2016; 40(4):304-14. PMC: 4849733. DOI: 10.1002/gepi.21965. View

3.
Carter A, Sanderson E, Hammerton G, Richmond R, Davey Smith G, Heron J . Mendelian randomisation for mediation analysis: current methods and challenges for implementation. Eur J Epidemiol. 2021; 36(5):465-478. PMC: 8159796. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-021-00757-1. View

4.
Karim A, Westenberg L, Eurelings L, Otten R, Gerth van Wijk R . The association between allergic diseases and cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Neth J Med. 2019; 77(2):42-66. View

5.
Sanderson E, Davey Smith G, Windmeijer F, Bowden J . An examination of multivariable Mendelian randomization in the single-sample and two-sample summary data settings. Int J Epidemiol. 2018; 48(3):713-727. PMC: 6734942. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyy262. View