» Articles » PMID: 37566629

Receptive Field Sizes and Neuronal Encoding Bandwidth Are Constrained by Axonal Conduction Delays

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Aug 11
PMID 37566629
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Studies on population coding implicitly assume that spikes from the presynaptic cells arrive simultaneously at the integrating neuron. In natural neuronal populations, this is usually not the case-neuronal signaling takes time and populations cover a certain space. The spread of spike arrival times depends on population size, cell density and axonal conduction velocity. Here we analyze the consequences of population size and axonal conduction delays on the stimulus encoding performance in the electrosensory system of the electric fish Apteronotus leptorhynchus. We experimentally locate p-type electroreceptor afferents along the rostro-caudal body axis and relate locations to neurophysiological response properties. In an information-theoretical approach we analyze the coding performance in homogeneous and heterogeneous populations. As expected, the amount of information increases with population size and, on average, heterogeneous populations encode better than the average same-size homogeneous population, if conduction delays are compensated for. The spread of neuronal conduction delays within a receptive field strongly degrades encoding of high-frequency stimulus components. Receptive field sizes typically found in the electrosensory lateral line lobe of A. leptorhynchus appear to be a good compromise between the spread of conduction delays and encoding performance. The limitations imposed by finite axonal conduction velocity are relevant for any converging network as is shown by model populations of LIF neurons. The bandwidth of natural stimuli and the maximum meaningful population sizes are constrained by conduction delays and may thus impact the optimal design of nervous systems.

Citing Articles

Effect of burst spikes on linear and nonlinear signal transmission in spiking neurons.

Schlungbaum M, Barayeu A, Grewe J, Benda J, Lindner B J Comput Neurosci. 2024; 53(1):37-60.

PMID: 39560916 PMC: 11868171. DOI: 10.1007/s10827-024-00883-1.

References
1.
Shamir M . Emerging principles of population coding: in search for the neural code. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014; 25:140-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.01.002. View

2.
Mehaffey W, Maler L, Turner R . Intrinsic frequency tuning in ELL pyramidal cells varies across electrosensory maps. J Neurophysiol. 2008; 99(5):2641-55. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00028.2008. View

3.
Chacron M, Lindner B, Longtin A . Noise shaping by interval correlations increases information transfer. Phys Rev Lett. 2004; 92(8):080601. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.080601. View

4.
Swadlow H, Rosene D, Waxman S . Characteristics of interhemispheric impulse conduction between prelunate gyri of the rhesus monkey. Exp Brain Res. 1978; 33(3-4):455-67. DOI: 10.1007/BF00235567. View

5.
Stocks . Suprathreshold stochastic resonance in multilevel threshold systems. Phys Rev Lett. 2000; 84(11):2310-3. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2310. View